Answer: I would say that it can be a an example of counterculture since it shows different points of view according to different cultural standards.
Explanation:
Scholars such as Joanne Martin and Caren Siehl, deem counterculture and cultural development as "a balancing act, [that] some core values of a counterculture should present a direct challenge to the core values of a dominant culture". Therefore, a prevalent culture and a counterculture should coexist in an uneasy symbiosis, holding opposite positions on valuable issues that are essentially important to each of them. According to this theory, a counterculture can contribute a plethora of useful functions for the prevalent culture, such as "articulating the foundations between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and providing a safe haven for the development of innovative ideas".
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
For the ethical researcher, the major problem with deception is that it tends to involve direct attacks on other people’s consent.
And of course, that is not ethical and professional researchers and companies shouldn't ever do that.
Researchers need to be very honest and clear about the purpose of research, the instruments used, the risks -if there are any- and the way results are going to be used.
Researchers also have to get the written consent from the people that are going to be part of the study. This way, participants are going to be aware of any details.
Social contract theory
"government serves the will of the people"
Answer:
Potential of taking his/her life
Explanation:
Borderline personality disorder (BPD), which is also known as emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD),is a mental disorderliness characterized by a long-term pattern of unstable relationships, distorted sense of self, and strong emotional reactions. Hence this can lead clients to taking his or her own life
Answer:
In the ideal sense, if Morgandi can transfer the knowledge she acquired from using the measuring tools while cooking to her math class, she will be able to learn the math quicker.
She will find it much easier than Eric to understand the math lessons about fractions
Morgandi was actively learning about fractions so she was practicing fractions. For Eric, he is probably learning about fractions for the first time so it will take time and practice for him to grasp the concept. If he is learning cognitively, he will need to actively practice fractions, for example, helping their mother cook and using measuring tools.
It will be easier for her as the math class will be like her cookng experience.Her mind may process the information in a way that it relates to her cooking experience.Morgandi is said to bring more interest to the learning situation than Eric.
She already has experience with the subject so it should be easier for her to learn. However, she may have to build her procedural knowledge, such as how to divide and multiply the fractions. Eric, however, who has never used fractions will have to obtain both declarative and procedural knowledge. He will have to learn general knowledge about fractions as well as how to divide and multiply them. Because of this, Eric will most likely take longer to learn the material.
Explanation:
in the learning process, an important factor to look to is what the individual brings to new learning situations. Having a foundational knowledge on which to construct additional knowledge will give one an edge over another as in the case of Morgandi who has a back up experience of cooking than Eric
