I'll take this challenge since I'm not feeling lazy for once.... x would represent Gavin and y would represent Seiji.
a.
b. I will solve your system using substitution.
<span>Step 1: Solve </span>

for x

(add -y for both sides)

<span>Step 2: substitute </span>

for x in


<span>
</span>


(simplify both sides of the equation)

(add -425 to both sides)<span>
</span>


y=200
step 3: substitute 200 for y in





c. Already answered with the picture that is attached.
d. Gavin earned 225 dollars while Seiji earned 200 dollars.
No they won’t be.Consider the linear combination (1)(u – v) + (1) (v – w) + (-1)(u – w).This will add to 0. But the coefficients aren’t all 0.Therefore, those vectors aren’t linearly independent.
You can try an example of this with (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1), the usual basis vectors of R3.
That method relied on spotting the solution immediately.If you couldn’t see that, then there’s another approach to the problem.
We know that u, v, w are linearly independent vectors.So if au + bv + cw = 0, then a, b, and c are all 0 by definition.
Suppose we wanted to ask whether u – v, v – w, and u – w are linearly independent.Then we’d like to see if there are non-zero coefficients in the linear combinationd(u – v) + e(v – w) + f(u – w) = 0, where d, e, and f are scalars.
Distributing, we get du – dv + ev – ew + fu – fw = 0.Then regrouping by vector: (d + f)u + (-d +e)v + (-e – f)w = 0.
But now we have a linear combo of u, v, and w vectors.Therefore, all the coefficients must be 0.So d + f = 0, -d + e = 0, and –e – f = 0. It turns out that there’s a free variable in this solution.Say you let d be the free variable.Then we see f = -d and e = d.
Then any solution of the form (d, e, f) = (d, d, -d) will make (d + f)u + (-d +e)v + (-e – f)w = 0 a true statement.
Let d = 1 and you get our original solution. You can let d = 2, 3, or anything if you want.
Answer:
-3x-3y-z=38
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the equation of the tangent plane you can use

the point P is (-6,-6,-2). Hence you have

hope this helps!!
I got you !
Step-by-step explanation:
45 bulbs planted in first year.
65 bulbs the next year.
increase = 20 bulbs
Number of increase of planted tulip bulb is N = 65 - 45 = 20
( 20/45) x 100% = 44.4 % to the nearest tenths
Answer:Bill
Step-by-step explanation:
Because Bill scored to the nearest 100