A :-) for this question , we should apply
F = ma
Given - F = 12 N
a = 0.20 m/s^2
Solution -
F = ma
12 = m x 0.20
m = 12 by 0.20
m = 60 kg
.:. The mass is 60 kg.
If you are asking for a proof on having at least 3 dimensions in space, you can find the physical proof anywhere in your daily life activities. Just the fact that solids have volumes is a proof already that we live in a three-dimensional space. We can move forwards, backwards, sidewards and in all other directions possible.
When you go right into detail, the fundamental laws governing these proofs are very technical. They have differential equations to show as proof. It is too detailed to discuss here. The important things is that, these fundamental laws are what explains the science in our basic activities and natural phenomena:
*Gravitation and planetary motion
* Translation, rotation, magnetic field, forces
* Integrals of equations:
Answer:
890 N
Explanation:
Acceleration is change in velocity over change in time.
a = Δv / Δt
a = (11 m/s − 0 m/s) / 0.26 s
a = 42.3 m/s²
Force is mass times acceleration.
F = ma
F = (21 kg) (42.3 m/s²)
F ≈ 890 N
You have not provided the diagram, therefore, I cannot provide an exact answer.
However, I will try to help by explaining how to solve this problem.
When light moves from air to glass:1- part of the light is reflected back into the air where the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection
2- part of the light enters the water and refracts. The angle of refraction can be calculated using Snell's law.
In a diagram, the reflected ray would be the one getting back into air while the refracted ray would be the one entering the water.
You can check the attached diagram for further illustrations.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Too old(Ex. if real time is 1000 then they estimate >1000)
Explanation:
This is because with time our planet may have a definite function which describes temperature.(Because of all the factors and global warming except nuclear bomb testing)
Now nuclear test on planet have significant effect on temperature rise.
Also 14°C rise in temperature is good one because of this.
If future archaeologists only consider that uniform function as above mentioned then they estimate more time then the real one.
Thus too old is right answer.