Answer:
Option B $17,285 is correct the answer.
Explanation:
<u>Computation Table </u>
<u>Particular Amount</u>
Ending balance $18,600
Add: Deposit in transit $1,550
Less: Outstanding $2,100
Add: NSF check $800
Add: Bank charges $35
<u>Less</u><u>: EFT $1,600
</u>
<u>Cash balance $17285
</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
Production or consumption activities lead to an external cost for the third party, which causes the social marginal cost to exceed the private marginal cost. Consumers and producers base their decisions on private marginal cost and there would be an overproduction or excessive consumption of the good. The balance output is more than the efficient output.
Taxes must be imposed to correct the divergence between social and private marginal costs.
On the other hand, production or consumption leads to an external benefit for the third party, which means that the marginal social benefit exceeds the private marginal benefit. Consumers and producers base their decision on private marginal benefit and there would be underproduction or low consumption of the good. The balance output is less than the efficient output. The government would have to provide subsidies to producers or consumers to correct these inefficiencies.
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Marginal costs refer to the additional expense incurred in the manufacturing of one more unit of a product. It is the incremental cost associated with producing an extra unit of a good.
The formula for calculating marginal cost is,
MC = change in cost/ Change in quantity
in this case:
MC = $1550 - $ 1500
26-25
MC = $50/1
Marginal costs= $50
Answer:
Annual deposit = $4100
Explanation:
Annual deposit = $4100
Number of years for retirement = 30 years
Future value of money = $1000000
Interest rate = 12%
Now use the below formula to find the annuity amount.
Annual deposit = Future value (A/F, r, n)
Annual deposit = 1000000 (A/F, 12%, 30)
Annual deposit = 1000000(0.0041)
Annual deposit = $4100
Answer: The 1990s
Explanation:
The aim of human relations is to enable the creation of a win-win scenario such that employee needs can be satisfied and organizational objectives can also be achievable.
In the 1990s, employees had more input into management decisions and how they performed their jobs. Also, the use of groups and teams also became popular.
