Answer:
c. -2
Step-by-step explanation:
because the linear line goes down we know it is negative
and its not 1/2 because it is rise over run. it runs 1 and rises 2 (or drops 2 because it is negative)
rise over run = -2/1 = -2
Answer:
22
Step-by-step explanation:
She ate 10 cookies
1/3 of 30 is 10
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
