Answer:
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Explanation:
According to "A transnational strategy is difficult to achieve because the multiple objectives involved are contradictory" the given statement is False.
<h3>Briefing:</h3>
Because of its competing objectives, a transnational strategy is challenging to implement. Even when successfully implemented, the transnational strategy frequently results in less performance than either the multi-domestic or global strategies.
<h3>What is a global strategy?</h3>
An international business structure in which a company's global business operations are coordinated through collaboration as well as the interdependence between its head office, operational divisions, and globally dispersed subsidiaries or retail outlets
<h3>What is the significance of a global strategy?</h3>
A transnational strategy will help businesses that want to expand internationally enter a local market more successfully and quickly build a customer base. This is largely due to the fact that local staff members should be more able to communicate with others in their culture than may be the case with outsiders.
To know more about transnational strategy visit:
brainly.com/question/28199118
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is:
A transnational strategy is difficult to achieve because the multiple objectives involved are contradictory. True or False.
Answer:
Stratovolcanoes
Explanation:
But that's just one type of volcano – the stratovolcano (or composite volcano). Stratovolcanoes consist of many layers (strata) of hardened lava, tephra, pumice, and volcanic ash. They generally have steep slopes and are the most common type of volcanoes on Earth.
source from: https://www.zmescience.com/other/science-abc/types-of-volcano/
YOUR WELCOME
Answer:
Compassion and Caring
Explanation:
Ethics is the term that refers to the individual behavior of being human based on the consepts of moral philosophy that he received from the society in which he lives. In this case, ethics is a rationalized, individual and intrinsic value of the human being, which is directly connected with the values to which he is concerned. Because it is something individual, the fundamental value of ethics can vary, but in general, the fundamental value does not represent compassion and care, but rather what characterizes an individual as ethical comosliding, justice, honesty, truth, respect, tolerance and tolerance.
