Since the 17 is in the hundreds place, the fraction would be 17/100. ☺️
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The goal to solving any equation is to have x = {something}. That means we need to get the x out from underneath that radical. It's a square root, so we can "undo" it by squaring. Square both sides because this is an equation. Squaring both sides gives you
Get everything on one side of the equals sign and set the quadratic equal to 0:
Throw this into the quadratic formula to get that the solutions are x = 5 and -8. We need to see if only one works, both work, or neither work in the original equation.
Does 
?
and
and 5 = 5. So 5 works. Let's try -8 now:
and
so
-8 = 8? No it doesn't. So only 5 works. Your choice is the third one down.
Answer:
<em>-(6 1/3-1/6x 36=216</em>
Hope I helped
2867.5 is bigger
Even though they both show 5 numbers, the second one has only one decimal place versus 2 on the first
If you ignore the decimal, your left with
290 vs 2867
2867 is much bigger than 290 so this is the answer
9514 1404 393
Answer:
y -2 = -2/3(x +4)
Step-by-step explanation:
There are several different forms of the equation for a line. Each is useful in its own way. Here, the line crosses the y-axis at a point between integer values, so using that intercept point could be problematical. That suggests the "point-slope" form of the equation for a line would be a better choice.
That form is ...
y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)
__
The two marked points are (-4, 2) and (5, -4). All we need is the slope.
The slope is given by the formula ...
m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1) . . . . . . . . where the given points are (x1, y1) and (x2, y2)
m = (-4 -2)/(5 -(-4)) = -6/9 = -2/3
Using the first point, the equation for the line can now be written as ...
y -2 = -2/3(x -(-4))
y -2 = -2/3(x +4)
