I would say D. Most consumers didn't stay away from the company
because if your trying to boycott something then you are protesting against that company and you are not using whatever that company has, so if the consumers didn't stay away then they would still use and be around the company and that is not the purpose of boycotting
Hope this helps!! :D
There was both guerilla warfare and trench warfare in this global war
In the early 1900's , a company often provided a company town, a place where the worker could live in the near working location ( usually like a mining location)
The workers usually were lured by the promise of high wage.
But here's the thing, in company town, a source of living usually can only obtained in a company store, and the cost is really high.
So instead of getting a high wage, the workers trapped in huge debt to the company, creating some sort of slavery that they have to work to pay off their debt to the company
Techincally, the company could easily bring those workers to the court ( even though is very cruel, they obtain the debt in a 'legal' way), so basically workers cant do a thing
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1112438#readmore
