<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer: hello your question is incomplete attached below is the missing part
answer : There is no slope
Step-by-step explanation:
To interpret the slope we plot a graph of Winter severity index vs Fawn count
slope = Δy / Δx = 0
attached below is the graph
There no slope because the graph is a curve and not a straight line graph
I looked it up, and after some research, I came across a legitimate answer of approximately 30 gallons.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. 3 1/7 b. 3 1/6 and c. 2
All you need to do is divide 96 by 8 and you get 12 as your answer