Answer:
Given that,
Sales discount forfeited = $600
Cost of goods sold = $13,000
Other expenses = $4,100
Expenses accounts:
= Cost of goods sold + Other expenses
= $13,000 + $4,100
= $17,100
Therefore, the second entry in the closing process is as follows:
Income summary A/c Dr. $17,100
To Cost of goods sold $13,000
To other expenses $4,100
(To record the closing entry)
Answer:
Using High and Low Method
Cost Miles
$
High 1,250 4,000
Low <u>(970) </u> <u>(3,000)</u>
<u> 280 </u> <u>1,000</u>
Variable cost per mile = $2,800/1,000
=$0.28 per mile
Explanation:
In this question, there is need to obtain the difference with the highest cost and lowest cost. We also need to calculate the difference between the highest miles and lowest miles. Finally, we will divide the difference in cost by the difference in miles in order to determine the variable cost per mile.
Answer: 1 2 7 8
Explanation: plz mark me as brainiest im begging
For the statement "The payoff matrix represents hypothetical profits that could be earned by two milk..." and the Milky Mose table Both will cheat Option C. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
payoff matrix?</h3>
Generally, payoff matrix is simply defined as when one player's tactics and those of the other are represented in a table called a payoff matrix, they are listed in rows.
In conclusion, In order to get an edge, both parties will engage in dishonesty. As a result, both parties will be tempted to cheat in order to gain an unfair advantage.
The payoff matrix below represents hypothetical profits that could be earned by two milk sellers who have formed a cartel. Each seller must decide if they want to cheat or not to cheat on the production quotas in the cartel agreement. Use the payoff matrix to answer the questions below. Does either member have an incentive to cheat? Heifer's Gold will cheat, but Milky Moo will not. No, neither has an incentive to cheat, Yes, both will cheat. Milky Moo's will cheat, but Heifer's Gold will not
Read more about payoff matrix
brainly.com/question/7656949
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answers are : unauthorized, identified, facts, affirm, authorization, withdraws, observe.
Explanation:
Ratification occurs when the principal accepts responsibility for the agent's unauthorized acts. For ratification to be valid, the agent must have acted on behalf of an identified principal, that principal must know all of the material facts , must affirm the agent's act in its entirety, and must have the legal authorization to ratify the transaction both at the time the agent engages in the act and at the time the principal ratifies it. The principal's ratification must occur before the third party withdraws from the transaction, and the principal must observe the same formalities when ratifying the act as would have been required to authorize it initially.
