Answer:
Depending on the circumstances, a refusal can lead to license suspension, jail time, fines, and having to install an ignition interlock device (IID).
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
Answer:
A firm is a price taker BECAUSE other firms can dive into the market with ease and manufacture a product that is not so different from every other firm's product. With this, it will not be easy for any firm to set their own prices.
Explanation: A trade that do not affect the price of a commodity if he or she buys or sells shares is called a PRICE TAKER.
Firms in perfectly competition market are price takers because as soon as the equilibrium price is set for a commodity, firms must accept.
Agriculture is an example of a perfect competition since each farmers have no control on the market price .
Also, financial assets like stocks and bonds is a good example too
A juvenile court could not hear a case involving a contract dispute because it lacks jurisdiction. subject matter
The juvenile court docket, additionally known as kid's court, special courtroom dealing with troubles of delinquent, not noted, or abused youngsters. The juvenile court fulfills the authorities's rolean as alternative determine, and, wherein no juvenile court exists, other courts should anticipate the characteristic.
The Juvenile Court no longer ponders a minimal age of criminality. Ten (10) is the minimum age for comfortable detention of a juvenile until it's far a capital offense. need to be at least 13 (thirteen) years of age so one can be declared as a JSO. The age of 18 triggers adult courtroom jurisdiction.2
Learn more about juvenile court here:-brainly.com/question/11399114
#SPJ4
Disclaimer: your question is incomplete, please see below for the complete question.
a. in personam
b. in rem
c. quasi in rem
d. subject matter
