Answer:
$74,400
Explanation:
Pell Company
Pell's income from Demers for the year ended December 31, 2010
Controlling Interest Share of Net Income for 2010- Excess Fair value Annual Amortization
Controlling Interest Share of Net Income for 2010= ($100,000 × .80) $80,000
Less Excess Fair Value Annual Amortization =($7,000 × .80) $5,600
Pell Income= $74,400
Answer:
Liquidity
Explanation:
Liquidity is the degree to which an asset can be converted to cash. Assets that can easily be converted are described as liquid assets and include stocks and bonds.
Illiquid assets are not easy to sell. These assets may take a long time to sell or may be sold at a much cheaper price than the purchase price in order to make a quick sale. These include real estate, motor vehicles etc.
Answer:
a. $1,765,000
Explanation:
Total stockholder’s equity on December 31, 2013 = Total equity at end 2012 – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $28 per share – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $35 per share + amount collect from 1,800 shares of treasury stock were sold at $30 per share + net income of $450,000
= $1,450,000 – 3,000 * $28 – 3,000 * $35 + 1,8000 *$30 + $450,000 = $1,765,000
Answer:
It is 0.98
Explanation:
Total Assets Turnover Ratio(TATR) = <u> Net Sales </u>
Average Total Assets
Net Assets =Gross Sales-Trade discounts-Sales tax-Sales return
TATR = 940,000/955,000 = 0.98 times
It is the ratio of a company's net sales to its average assets employed.
It is a ratio that tells how efficient the company is using its assets to generate its revenue.
The drawback of this ratio is that, if the divisional manager performance is based on this, it may sometimes leads to short-term view of performance. This may then encourage dysfunctional behaviour which may include refusal to replace an old assets with lower based value which when replace may reduce this ratio because of the higher based value of the new assets while sales still remain the same
Answer:
c. unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Under the first amendment the act of banning such printed materials is unconstitutional. As it is not good for people in the country to witness such things.
As printed material includes books, magazines, and other things which enhance the knowledge level of different people.
Therefore, banning printed material will make the country people short of knowledgeable resources.
Therefore, the court will announce it unconstitutional.
