I believe the answer is "abnormal psychology"
Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
<h2>Answer:-) ✿ ✿ ✿ ✿</h2>
<h2>Civil courts (not to be confused with the civil-law legal system) </h2><h2>deal with “private” controversies, particularly disputes that arise between individuals or between private businesses or institutions </h2><h2>Explanation :-) </h2>
<h2>keep smiling ☺️ ♡</h2>
<h2>Sorry !! ☹️</h2>
<h2>follow back plzz </h2>
Answer: =3 3/7
Explanation: Rewriting our equation with parts separated
=6+3/7−1−6/3
Solving the whole number parts
6−1=5
Solving the fraction parts
3/7−6/3=
Answer: Weak ties are valuable parts of a social network because: they are more likely to introduce us to new information and ideas.
