Answer:
300
Step-by-step explanation:
300 would be the answer because they told us to round it up to the NEAREST HUNDRED. 2 neares hundred with 264 are 200 and 300
But as we can see which one is nearer:
300 - 264 = 36
200 - 264 = -64 or 264 -200 = 64
So in this case, 300 would be the closest round up to hundred of 264
Hope this help :3
The width in inches would be 12, because of the formula:
length x width = perimeter
so you would do it reverse!
perimeter/length = width
so, 144/12 = 12
f(x) = 2(x^2 + 14x + ) - 5 2 is taken out of first 2 terms.
f(x) = 2(x^2 + 14x + (14/2)^2 ) - 5 - 2(14/2)^2
<em><u>2 steps </u></em>
- Inside the brackets: Linear term's coefficient (14) divided by 2 and squared
- Outside the brackets: (14/2)^2 multiplied by 2 and subtract so that there is no change in the value of the quadratic.
f(x) = 2*(x + 7)^2 - 103
The graph is of the original quadratic.
Answer:
x>-1
Step-by-step explanation:
-9 goes to the left side of the equation making it +9 so 9-10>x which results in -1<x
1.64 = 164/100 = 41/25 = 1 16/25