The vertex is the high point of the curve, (2, 1). The vertex form of the equation for a parabola is
.. y = a*(x -h)^2 +k . . . . . . . for vertex = (h, k)
Using the vertex coordinates we read from the graph, the equation is
.. y = a*(x -2)^2 +1
We need to find the value of "a". We can do that by using any (x, y) value that we know (other than the vertex), for example (1, 0).
.. 0 = a*(1 -2)^2 +1
.. 0 = a*1 +1
.. -1 = a
Now we know the equation is
.. y = -(x -2)^2 +1
_____
If we like, we can expand it to
.. y = -(x^2 -4x +4) +1
.. y = -x^2 +4x -3
=========
An alternative approach would be to make use of the zeros. You can read the x-intercepts from the graph as x=1 and x=3. Then you can write the equation as
.. y = a*(x -1)*(x -3)
Once again, you need to find the value of "a" using some other point on the graph. The vertex (x, y) = (2, 1) is one such point. Subsituting those values, we get
.. 1 = a*(2 -1)*(2 -3) = a*1*-1 = -a
.. -1 = a
Then the equation of the graph can be written as
.. y = -(x -1)(x -3)
In expanded form, this is
.. y = -(x^2 -4x +3)
.. y = -x^2 +4x -3 . . . . . . same as above
It would be the first one because it says that there are 4 times as many red roses as pink roses and so that would be represented r=4p
Hope this helps! Good luck!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If 
then
by combining like terms. (I'm thinking you might have mistyped the problem because this representation is weird).
Here it is given that AB || CD
< EIA = <GJB
Now
∠EIA ≅ ∠IKC and ∠GJB is ≅ ∠ JLD (Corresponding angles)
∠EIA ≅ ∠GJB then ∠IKC ≅ ∠ JLD (Substitution Property of Congruency)
∠IKL + ∠IKC 180° and ∠DLH + ∠JLD =180° (Linear Pair Theorem)
So
m∠IKL + m∠IKC = 180° ....(1)
But ∠IKC ≅ ∠JLD
m∠IKC = m∠JLD (SUBTRACTION PROPERTY OF CONGRUENCY)
So we have
m∠IKL + m∠JLD = 180°
∠IKL and ∠JLD are supplementary angles.
But ∠DLH and ∠JLD are supplementary angles.
∠IKL ≅ ∠DLH (CONGRUENT SUPPLEMENTS THEOREM)
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
the triangles are similar so will be the same proprotion,
I have attached a picture showing how I solved this. the second traingle is 3 times as large (15 by 12) compared to the first triangle which is 4 by 5.
