Answer:
<em>Employee stock ownership plan</em>
Explanation:
An employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is <em>a retirement plan wherein the employer contributes its shares (or funds to purchase its stock) to the fund for the advantage of the employees of the company.</em>
The company maintains an account for every employee who participates in the program.
Over time stock shares accumulate before an employee is eligible to them.
With an ESOP, while still working with the company, you never purchase or keep the stock directly.
If an employee is fired, decides to retire, is disabled, or dies, the company must transfer the stock shares in the account of the employee.
Answer: PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION
Explanation:
This is a marketing strategy that some companies employ whereby they aim to distinguish their products from that of competitors by giving it certain features that expound on its strength in the market.
This strategy can create a competitive advantage for goods that will ensure that the company maintains a dominant place in the market.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Employment-at-will
Explanation:
Under the employment-at-will doctrine, employers can dismiss an employee for any reason as long as the reason is not illegal (for example, firing someone because of his race or sex, which would be illegal discrimination), and employees can leave the job at anytime at will. Under this doctrine, if you do not want to keep working, you just stop going to your job.
The benefit of this doctrine is that it gives more labor flexibility and avoids the existence of lawsuits. The con of this doctrine is that it reduces labor protections.
Answer:10;5.
Explanation:John Firman was an adjunct professor in the American University, he teaches Seminar in policing in the Graduate schools of the institution. He has also worked with the Governor of Illinois, where he worked as an Associate Director of the Illinois Criminal Justice Authority between the year 1985-1994 Mr. John Firman is the Director of the Research Division of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP.) According to professor Firman,the most common restriction on hiring applicants for police service with a history of drug use within the recent past is ten years for hard drugs and five years for marijuana.
