The above statement is true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the oxidation of an amino acid through the Citric acid cycle or the Kreb’s cycle produces 2 ATP. Through oxidation of Glucose also 2 ATP molecules are obtained.
In the citric acid cycle the acetate is consumed along with water and the NAD+ is reduced to NADH with carbon dioxide as its waste product and stored in the form of chemical energy as two molecules of Adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In oxidation of glucose through glycolysis without the use of Oxygen 2 molecules of ATP is produced.
Answer:
it means that student is running 8meters per second
<span><span>As for the responder, science study as much as it can
process. Though there are certain principles, theories and laws needed to
determine one is truly science. It needs to undergo the scientific method to
analyze and gather evidential data and in addition this study should be
replicable in the process. Replicable is one strong characteristic of a study
that can intensify the reliability and validity of the field. And what science
doesn’t study is not until the principles apply to the aforementioned
statement. Science can study and wants to understand everything or in as much
as the broader scope of each phenomenon, it’s some concepts that are just very
hard to gather data, and studies like the metaphysical and paranormal that can’t
be repeated. These limitations inhibit scientists to draw data that is reliable
and valid, thus, science. </span> </span>
Ofc obvi . If it’s between any type of buns then ofc :-)
Answer:
Explanation:
It certainly isn't the last one. A theory is close to a guess. It fits all the known facts, but there is usually something missing. If someone figures out what is missing, usually by experiment, then the theory become a fact.
The rest of them (1 2 an 3) can all be true. 3 is the least viable. You have to be able to come up with a counter example to reject a theory.
I'm not sure about 2. New phenomena can still be part of current theories. Reluctantly, I wouldn't choose 2 because
1 is the best answer of a very poor lot. Do not be surprised if you use it, that it turns out to be wrong.
