Answer:
Situation 1 is a probably contingency. This recall is occurring and can be estimated as costing $2 million. This amount should be charge to the warranties payable and warranties expense accounts.
Date
Particulars
Ref.no
Debit $
Credit $
Warrantee expenses
20,00,000
Warranty payable account
20,00,000
[To record the estimated claims]
Comment
Step 3 of 3
Situation 2 is a reasonable contingency. The costs are possible and there are rough estimates for cleanup but there are also rough estimates about reimbursements for property damage. This situation would be disclosed on the balance sheet.
Situation 3 is a remote contingency. There is a small change that there could be property damage but there is no way to determine how much or what the costs could be. There is no amount marked down for this situation
Explanation:
Answer:
4.95%
Explanation:
For computing the yield to maturity when expressed in real terms, first we have to find out the yield to maturity by applying the RATE formula that is shown in the attachment
Given that,
Present value = $989.40
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 7% ÷ 2 = $35
NPER = 10 years × 2 = 20 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the yield to maturity is 7.15%
Now in real terms, it would be
= 7.15% - 2.2%
= 4.95%
Answer:
That is correct this is a liability
Explanation:
That is correct this is a liability. That is because a liability refers to being legally responsible for something. In this scenario, since they paid you $200 for hair coloring then you owe the client that. Meaning that you are legally responsible to provide hair coloring services to the client and until you do that you are liable.
Answer:
Small
Explanation:
Fixed costs are the costs that do not change when output level changes, while variable costs are costs that change as output quantity changes.
When a production process is capacity constrained, it implies that there is a factor that does not allow it to produce more output. Examples of such factors are minor bottlenecks, constrained designs and resources, and others.
A process is said to be efficient when it can avoid waste of resources in producing desired output.
Efficiency improvement therefore occurs when more output can be produced with less resources.
In the question, given that the process is currently capacity-constrained, efficiency improvement will result in producing more output at higher costs because of high variable costs despite that the process has low fixed costs.
As a result, the impact of an efficiency improvement will be small because producing more output will result in incurring higher cost due to high variable costs that change as quantity of output changes. That is, the impact of efficiency improvement will be small because high variable costs with low fixed cost will result in higher production cost.
I think the answer is D.52
