Answer:
explicit
Explanation:
Explicit knowledge: Explicit knowledge is also referred to as expressive knowledge. It is defined as the knowledge that is being willingly articulated, stored, codified, and accessed and can easily be transferred from one person to another. An apprehender's explicit knowledge can be made explicit through the verbal statement.
In the question above, the information Caroline acquired is an example of explicit knowledge.
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Answer:Self-interest study
Explanation:
It is the case of self-interest study where the concerned party conducts the research for their personal benefits to promote their brands.
This research has nothing to do the public domain as it is just a marketing strategy to gain more consumers and establish an appealing image in consumers.Since it is a beverage company therefore they are researching for performance of subject after drinking energy drink.
<span>Alright they made peace, they conquered other lands, demanded tribute, improved farm lands and irrigations systems for #1. Im sorry I couldnt finish half of the question because I need to go eat dinner!</span>
