Answer:b. enlightened self-interest school
Explanation:
Enlightened self-interest can be defined as the ability of understanding and trusting that as we impact other people's lives positives our lives will also be impacted positively to some extent. As the saying which says "what goes around comes around " simple put. Even though our action may be driven by internal desires to acquire personal satisfaction but under the enlightened self-interest we also look for the needs of others to ensure their wellbeing; it is a two way street everyone benefits.
Devoting ourselves to improving other people lives gives us that satisfaction and the drive to keep going.
It is a fulfilling act that leaves an individual content with their lives for having played a role that changes someone else's live for good.
Answer:
Rudyard Kipling, in full Joseph Rudyard Kipling, (born December 30, 1865, Bombay [now Mumbai], India—died January 18, 1936, London, England), English short-story writer, poet, and novelist chiefly remembered for his celebration of British imperialism, his tales and poems of British soldiers in India, and his tales
A couple good questions would be: (assuming it's an experiment) Can it be redone with the same result and can the information being used be cited. Hope it helps!
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:Rituals can fulfill religious obligations or ideals, satisfy spiritual or emotional needs of the practitioners, strengthen of social bonds, provide social and moral education, demonstrate of respect or submission, allow one to state one's affiliation, obtain social acceptance or approval for some event—or rituals.
Hope this helped! (i really need a brainliest)
Thank you so much and have an
amazing day/night.
