Answer:
Null hypothesis: There is no relationship between direction of the ball and if it resulted in a hit or an out.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, the experiment conducted is to determine whether there is any relationship between the direction of the ball and if it resulted in a hit or an out.
A random sample of 300 balls hit into play in college baseball games is taken. For each ball hit into play, it is recorded whether the ball was hit to the left, center, or right of the field, and whether the ball resulted in a hit or an out.
The regression analysis would be used to determine whether there is any relationship between direction of the ball and if it resulted in a hit or an out.
The hypothesis for the regression analysis is defined as follows:
<em>H</em>₀: There is no relationship between direction of the ball and if it resulted in a hit or an out.
<em>H</em>ₐ: There is a significant relationship between direction of the ball and if it resulted in a hit or an out.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-5x² - 6 = -4x
-5x² + 4x - 6 = 0
a = -5 ; b = 4 ; c = -6
Discriminant = b² - 4ac
= 4² - 4*(-5)*(-6)
= 16 - 120
= -104
roots = 
![=\dfrac{-4+\sqrt{-104}}{2*(-5)};\dfrac{-4-\sqrt{-104}}{2*(-5)}\\\\=\dfrac{-4+2i\sqrt{26}}{-10} ; \dfrac{-4-2i\sqrt{26}}{-10}\\\\=\dfrac{(-2)[2-i\sqrt{26}]}{-10} \ ; \ \dfrac{(-2)[2+i\sqrt{26}]}{-10}\\\\=\dfrac{2-i\sqrt{26}}{5} \ ; \ \dfrac{2+i\sqrt{26}}{5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5Cdfrac%7B-4%2B%5Csqrt%7B-104%7D%7D%7B2%2A%28-5%29%7D%3B%5Cdfrac%7B-4-%5Csqrt%7B-104%7D%7D%7B2%2A%28-5%29%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5Cdfrac%7B-4%2B2i%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%7D%7B-10%7D%20%3B%20%5Cdfrac%7B-4-2i%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%7D%7B-10%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%28-2%29%5B2-i%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%5D%7D%7B-10%7D%20%5C%20%3B%20%5C%20%5Cdfrac%7B%28-2%29%5B2%2Bi%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%5D%7D%7B-10%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5Cdfrac%7B2-i%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%7D%7B5%7D%20%5C%20%3B%20%5C%20%5Cdfrac%7B2%2Bi%5Csqrt%7B26%7D%7D%7B5%7D)
Answer:
z=12
Step-by-step explanation:
divide by 1/2 to get the variable z by itself
So, in order to solve this problem, I will set up an equation. First, let's make x= the # of hours it takes Mr. Itol to complete a computer task, and since his assistant takes twice as long, lets make 2x=the # of hours it takes the assistant to complete the task. We also know that it takes the two of them 6 hours to complete the task together. We can now set up the following equation:

Now, in order to be able to solve this, we have to find the least common denominator, and then we can cancel out the denominators to solve for the top part. The LCD=6x and the new equation becomes:

Now, we can get rid of the denominators, and we get:

So, x= 9
Now we know that Mr. Itol would take 9 hours to complete the task if he were to do it himself. To find how long it would take his assistant to complete the same task by himself, we just need to plug in the x-value into 2x:

Therefore, your answer is that Mr. Itol would take 9 hours to do the job alone, while his assistant will take 18 hours (double the time) to do the job alone.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
D. The table shows two x-intercepts and it changes from increasing to decreasing.
Step-by-step explanation:
A logarithmic function isn't either of these. This is the correct answer of ed-genuity. Hope this helped! :)