All categories

3 years ago

What caused the rate of erosion to change around 1905 and 1906?

Engineering

2 answers:

weqwewe [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Building the Canadian hydroelectric plant reduced the rate of erosion after 1906. This change in the rate of erosion is represented by the change in the slope on the graph. Hydroelectric dams convert kinetic energy from moving water to electrical energy.

Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Building the Canadian hydroelectric plantExplanation:

What caused the slope to change around 1905 and 1906? Building the Canadian hydroelectric plant reduced the rate of erosion after 1906. This change in the rate of erosion is represented by the change in the slope on the graph. Hydroelectric dams convert kinetic energy from moving water to electrical energy.

You might be interested in

Can I get an answer to this question please

crimeas [40]

Answer:

(i) 12 V in series with 18 Ω.

(ii) 0.4 A; 1.92 W

(iii) 1,152 J

(iv) 18Ω — maximum power transfer theorem

Explanation:

As seen by the load, the equivalent source impedance is ...

10 Ω + (24 Ω || 12 Ω) = (10 +(24·12)/(24+12)) Ω = 18 Ω

The open-circuit voltage seen by the load is ...

(36 V)(12/(24 +12)) = 12 V

The Thevenin's equivalent source seen by the load is 12 V in series with 18 Ω.

The load current is ...

(12 V)/(18 Ω +12 Ω) = 12/30 A = 0.4 A . . . . load current

The load power is ...

P = I^2·R = (0.4 A)^2·(12 Ω) = 1.92 W . . . . load power

10 minutes is 600 seconds. At the rate of 1.92 J/s, the electrical energy delivered is ...

(600 s)(1.92 J/s) = 1,152 J

The load resistance that will draw maximum power is equal to the source resistance: 18 Ω. This is the conclusion of the Maximum Power Transfer theorem.

The power transferred to 18 Ω is ...

((12 V)/(18 Ω +18 Ω))^2·(18 Ω) = 144/72 W = 2 W

7 0

2 years ago

When do you know if you start volly ball

igomit [66]

Answer You ask your coach

7 0

3 years ago

What is polarized electrical receptacle used for

lidiya [134]

Answer:

they are used for electrical currents so that they can flow along the appropriate wires in the circuit

Explanation:

4 0

4 years ago

Refrigerant-134a at 400 psia has a specific volume of 0.1144 ft3/lbm. Determine the temperature of the refrigerant based on (a)

vekshin1

Answer:

a) Using Ideal gas Equation, T = 434.98°R = 435°R

b) Using Van Der Waal's Equation, T = 637.32°R = 637°R

c) T obtained from the refrigerant tables at P = 400 psia and v = 0.1144 ft³/lbm is T = 559.67°R = 560°R

Explanation:

a) Ideal gas Equation

PV = mRT

T = PV/mR

P = pressure = 400 psia

V/m = specific volume = 0.1144 ft³/lbm

R = gas constant = 0.1052 psia.ft³/lbm.°R

T = 400 × 0.1144/0.1052 = 434.98 °R

b) Van Der Waal's Equation

T = (1/R) (P + (a/v²)) (v - b)

a = Van Der Waal's constant = (27R²(T꜀ᵣ)²)/(64P꜀ᵣ)

R = 0.1052 psia.ft³/lbm.°R

T꜀ᵣ = critical temperature for refrigerant-134a (from the refrigerant tables) = 673.6°R

P꜀ᵣ = critical pressure for refrigerant-134a (from the refrigerant tables) = 588.7 psia

a = (27 × 0.1052² × 673.6²)/(64 × 588.7)

a = 3.596 ft⁶.psia/lbm²

b = (RT꜀ᵣ)/8P꜀ᵣ

b = (0.1052 × 673.6)/(8 × 588.7) = 0.01504 ft³/lbm

T = (1/0.1052) (400 + (3.596/0.1144²) (0.1144 - 0.01504) = 637.32°R

c) The temperature for the refrigerant-134a as obtained from the refrigerant tables at P = 400 psia and v = 0.1144 ft³/lbm is

T = 100°F = 559.67°R

7 0

3 years ago

When a man returns to his well-sealed house on a summer day, he finds that the house is at 35°C. He turns on the air conditioner

ipn [44]

Answer:

$\dot W = 1.667\, kW$

Explanation:

A well-sealed house means that there is no mass interaction between air indoors and outdoors. Hence, cooling process is isochoric. The heat removed by the air conditioner is:

$\dot Q_{L} = \frac{m_{air}}{\Delta t} \cdot c_{v, air} \cdot (T_{o}-T_{f})\\\dot Q_{L} = \frac{800\, kg}{(30\, min)\cdot (\frac{60\, s}{1 \, min} )}\cdot (0.7 \frac{kJ}{kg \cdot K}) \cdot (15\, K)\\\dot Q_{L} = 4.667\, kW$

The power drawn by the air conditioner is:

$\dot W = \frac{\dot Q_{L}}{COP_{R}} \\\dot W = \frac {4.667\, kW}{2.8}\\\dot W = 1.667\, kW$

3 0

3 years ago