<span>As indicated
by the article, Coca-Cola did not react quickly enough to alleviate and pacify
its purchasers that its Coke items are harmless and lawful. As indicated by
Coke's </span>social
responsibility commitments, the assertions of legislators spread quickly through India.
Nonetheless, the organization neglected to acknowledge how quick news went to.
Rather than looking to recover the trust and support from its clients, Coke
concentrated excessively on different workarounds. Coca-Cola shaped advisory groups
in India and the US. The advisory groups invested energy to run the tests, besides;
Coke was quiet to its shoppers. As specified by Mr. Seth, Coke's Indian
advertising expert, in the Indian culture, "Here individuals translate silence
as crime". Buyers needed to hear the official clarification from Coca-Cola
instantly and they would not like to hold up later. At long last, Coca-Cola
safeguarded their organization by claiming that different organizations have
comparative issues like Coke.
Answer: I think its B
Explanation: because if you wanted to build more houses you would need trees because you clear up some of the trees around you so you go to a new area and get more wood
Texas seems to be having a pretty rough football season.
Answer:
The following are the advantages of the public distribution system:
1. It has helped in stabilizing food prices and making food available to consumers at affordable prices.
2. It has helped in avoiding hunger and famine by supplying food from surplus regions of the country to deficient regions.
3. The system of minimum support price and procurement has contributed to increase in food grain production.
The following are the disadvantages of the public distribution system;
1. Instances of hunger occur despite granaries being full. This points to certain lacunae or inefficiency in the system.
2. High level of buffer stocks often leads to wastage of food grains and deterioration in quality.
3. The storage of food grains inculcates high carrying costs on the government.
John is a character who struggles with the idea of becoming fully adapted to the society of this brave new world. He has a deep appreciation for the humanist and philosophical concepts that existed at other times in history, and he is particularly fond of William Shakespeare. In this instance, John refuses to come to the party because he did not want to meet other people. This, however, causes problems for Bernard, as it makes his guests angry.It also causes some problems for Lenina, as she begins to think that he does not like her. John is justified to act in this way, as he has decided that he does not want to follow all the mandates of the new world.