Who is better James Charles or Ed Sheeran?

If a test is being used to make a dichotomous decision (e. G. , suitable or unsuitable for the job), the _____ marks the point o

wolverine [178]

If a test is being used to make a dichotomous decision (e. G. , suitable or unsuitable for the job), the cutting marks the point of decision.

<h3>What is the usefulness of cut off mark in a test?</h3>

cut off mark in a test is been used in the selection process after the test which is very important in the point of decision.

And this will be necessary to get the good hand for the job when the test is being used to make a dichotomous decision.

Learn more about cut off mark at:brainly.com/question/25997960

#SPJ12

3 0

2 years ago

______________ assumes that innovation is occurring within a highly uncertain environment and that the key to fast product innov

nordsb [41]

Answer:

Experiential Approach to Innovation

Explanation:

The correct word for the given statement is Experiential Approach to Innovation

So in fill in the blanks the word will be Experiential Approach to Innovation

The experiential methodology expect that instinct, adaptable alternatives, and hands-on experience can decrease vulnerability and quicken learning and comprehension.

A compression way to deal with advancement works best during times of steady change.

4 0

3 years ago

A CEO wants to make the argument that his company should put policies and structures in place to ensure adherence to the highest

forsale [732]

Answer:

the three options are valid:

Most consumers would prefer to buy products made by a company that demonstrates ethical behavior.
Research has shown a correlation between organizations' commitment to ethics and profitability.
Employees prefer to work for highly ethical organizations.

Explanation:

According to Accenture Strategy’s Global Consumer Pulse Research, the vast majority of consumers care about corporate actions and ethics, i.e. what the corporation says it does compared to what it really does. Also, the vast majority of consumers prefer to purchase products from ethical corporations. This is true not only because a research study says so, it is something logical.

Several researches have shown that higher corporate social responsibility results in higher profits. Basically the reasons for this correlation are the same ones as the previous statement's.

Employees, specially younger ones (40 years old and less) tend to be very concerned about working for ethical organizations and many are committed to improving ethical standards.

Information flows freely nowadays, and things that corporations could "hide" in the past, are made seen by millions in just a few minutes. Corporations aren't becoming ethical and green because they want to, they are doing so because consumers demand it.

3 0

4 years ago

Gatorade thirst quencher displays the letter g front and center along with the brand's iconic bolt. according to the company, "g

Alex787 [66]

Perception benefits.

Gatorade wants anyone who uses their product and sees their logo to associate it (aka have the perception) that the user is athletic.

4 0

4 years ago

On July 1, 2020, Sarasota Company purchased for $5,760,000 snow-making equipment having an estimated useful life of 5 years with

SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

1. We have:

Depreciation expense for 2014 = $920,000

Depreciation expense for 2015 = $1,472,000

2. We have:

Depreciation expense for 2014 = $1,152,000

Depreciation expense for 2015 = $1,843,200

3. Depreciation expense for 2016 = $1,972,000

Explanation:

1. Sum-of-the-years'-digits method.

Depreciable amount = Equipment cost – Salvage value = $5,760,000 - $240,000 = $5,520,000

Sum of the year digits = 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 15

Depreciation expense for a year = Depreciable amount * (Remaining years / Sum of the year digits) ………. (1)

Using equation (1), we have:

Depreciation expense for 2014 = $5,520,000 * (5 / 15) * (6 / 12) = $920,000

Depreciation expense for 2015 = $5,520,000 * (4 / 15) = $1,472,000

Accumulated depreciation at the end of 2015 = $920,000 + $1,472,000 = $2,392,000

Therefore, we have:

Sum-of-the-Years'-Digits Method 2014 2015

Equipment $5,760,000 $5,760,000

Less: Accumulated Depreciation (920,000) (2,392,000)

Year-End Book Value 4,600,000 3,128,000

Depreciation Expense for the Year 920,000 1,472,000

2. Double-declining balance method.

Depreciable amount = Equipment cost – Salvage value = $5,760,000 - $240,000 = $5,520,000

Double-declining depreciation rate = Straight line depreciation rate * 2 = (1 / Number of estimated useful life) * 2 = (1 / 5) * 2 = 0.40, or 40%

Depreciation expense for 2014 = Equipment cost * Double-declining depreciation rate = $5,760,000 * 40% * (6 / 12) = $1,152,000

Depreciation expense for 2015 = (Equipment cost - 2014 Depreciation expense) * Double-declining depreciation rate = ($5,760,000 - $1,152,000) * 40% = $1,843,200

Accumulated depreciation at the end of 2015 = $1,152,000 + $1,843,200= $2,995,200

Note that under Double-declining balance method, the salvage value is not considered until the last year of the asset.

Therefore, we have:

Double-Declining Balance Method 2014 2015

Equipment $5,760,000 $5,760,000

Less: Accumulated Depreciation (1,152,000) (2,995,200)

Year-End Book Value 3,456,000 2,073,600

Depreciation Expense for the Year 1,152,000 1,843,200

3. Compute the amount of depreciation expense for the 2016 income statement.

Straight line depreciation rate = 1 / Number of estimated useful life = 1 / 5 = 0.20, or 20%

Depreciable amount = Equipment cost – Salvage value = $5,760,000 - $240,000 = $5,520,000

Depreciation expense for 2014 = Depreciable amount * Straight line depreciation rate * (6 / 12) = $5,520,000 * 20% * (6 / 12) = $552,000

Depreciation expense for 2015 = Depreciable amount * Straight line depreciation rate = $5,520,000 * 20% = $1,104,000

Accumulated depreciation at the end of 2015 = $552,000 + $1,104,000 = $1,656,000

Net book value at end of 2015 = Equipment cost - Accumulated depreciation at the end of 2015 = $5,760,000 - $1,656,000 = $4,104,000

Depreciation expense for 2016 = (Net book value at end of 2015 - New Salvage value) / Remaining useful years = ($4,104,000 - $160,000) / 2 = $1,972,000

8 0

3 years ago