The answer to the question is A
All right.
Differences with the Historical Model:
1. That model shows the planet's orbits as perfect circles, not ellipses.
<span>2. Aristotle believed in a geocentric (Earth centered) solar system, while it actually is heliocentric Sun centered). </span>
<span>3. That model didn't show all the planets we know today, such as Neptune, Uranus, etc. </span>
<span>4. A lot of that model was based on religious beliefs.
</span>Differences with Modern Model:
1. Our model shows the orbits as ellipses.
<span>2. Our model shows a heliocentric solar system. </span>
<span>3. Our model shows all the planets we know today. </span>
<span>4. Our model has nothing to do with religion.
</span>Similarities Between Both Models:
1. They both are based on the same solar system.
<span>2. They both show the inner planets, the Moon, the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn. </span>
<span>3. The both were made by many observations of the sky.
</span>
Hope this helps.:b
Answer:
B. Earth's rotation around its axis
Explanation:
Answer:
Measuring heart rate and noting blood pressure is the answer.
Explanation:
Answer: Option D " all of the above "
Explanation: DNA can be a great source of information when used as a forensic evidence. This technique has many advantages and disadvantages when used as a source of information in case of crime.
Identical twins: There are some common fragments of DNA that is same in identical twins so it can be a difficulty in deciding the criminal.
Not enough of a sample: DNA should be present in a detectable amount to be used an sample for evidence, less than this detectable amount is a waste and cannot be used as a sample for evidence.
Contaminated and degraded sample: If the sample of DNA is contaminated or degraded then the result might be incorrect and might not be used as a sample for forensic evidence.
Hence, the correct answers are all of the above.
