Explanation:
new cells rather than growing bigger. Why is this ?
There are two main reasons why cells divide rather than continuing to grow larger and larger: ... If the cell grows too large, it will have trouble moving enough nutrients and wastes across the cell membrane. Cell Division. Cell division is the process by which cellular material is divided between two new daughter cells.
Why aren't you made of a few dozen, or a
few hundred cells, instead of trillions?
if the cell grows beyond a certain limit, not enough material will be able to cross the membrane fast enough to accommodate the increased cellular volume. When this happens, the cell must divide into smaller cells with favorable surface area/volume ratios, or cease to function. That is why cells are so small.
Why don't single-celled organisms like amoebas and paramecia grow
as big as a human? again The important point is that the surface area to the volume ratio gets smaller as the cell gets larger. Thus, if the cell grows beyond a certain limit, not enough material will be able to cross the membrane fast enough to accommodate the increased cellular volume.
i belive this is just the introduction to the project but here
Answer:
The correct answer is methane . Nature constitutes most of the substances made up of organic compounds. These compounds have carbon atoms attached with hydrogen atoms with a chemical bond (very few compounds may not have this bond).
Human exploitation of fragile ecosystems can lead to the droughts and arid conditions characteristic of desertification. Effects include land degradation, soil erosion and sterility, and a loss of biodiversity, with huge economic costs for nations where deserts are growing.
The answer is whales. In the Antartic and Arctic regions, krills and whales are very abundant in numbers. Whales are number one consumer of krills in these regions. They can feed on a large swarm of krills when they feed. They also have less competition on these icy waters. They gain energy every time from eating them.
The results will most likely be valid because the scientists kept getting the same results after REPEATED experiments. If they just conducted one experiment then they would not have been sure if what happened was a fluke or if another thing would happen after another experiment.<span />
