Answer:
E. It assumes that sales are determined solely by advertising and promotion.
Explanation:
The marginal-analysis model assesses the incremental benefits of an activity compared to the additional costs incurred by that same activity. It is a decision-making tool to help maximize potential profits or benefits.
Sales are not determined solely by advertising and promotion. There are many other factors, including price, demand and supply, the elasticity of the good, the nature of the good, among other factors. The sales of goods considered to be necessities are not affected much by advertising and promotion, unlike luxury goods, for example.
Answer:
The rate of return on total assets for 2017 is 62.03%
Explanation:
The return on total shows assets shows a relationship between the net income including interest expenses and the average total assets.
The computation of the rate of return on the total assets is shown below:
Rate of return on the total assets = {(Net income + Interest expense) ÷ average total assets)} × 100
= ($185,000 + $20,000) ÷ {($404,000 + $257000) ÷ 2} × 100
= ($205,000 ÷ $330,500) × 100
= 62.03%
Answer:T
The correct answer is option (c) Emotional
Explanation:
From the given question, Steve is suffering from emotional burnout
Steve is experiencing or having an Emotional type of burnout, this type of burnout comes if the employee were required by relatives,organization family.
Steve holding higher level of responsibility, that resulted emotional burn out for him.
Answer:
D. $221072.
Explanation:
In this question, we use the future value formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $0
Rate of interest = 5%
NPER = 25 years
PMT = 4,632
The formula is shown below:
= -FV(Rate;NPER;PMT;PV;type)
So, after solving this, the answer would be $221,071.92
Answer:
No they should not be held accountable.
Explanation:
When the actions were taken in the past it was legal, now that it is illegal the companies should not be held accountable. If they are it will set a bad precedent that will affect a lot of companies.
In the case of GE that did experiments on prisoners to test effects of irradiation however, even if criminal charges are not brought against them, they can face charges. What they did was wrong even if it was legal then.