
Note that both the numerator and denominator approach 0 as

, so we can try using L'Hopital's rule.

The denominator is nonzero at

, so the limit is equivalent to
Using transformations and congruency concepts, it is found that with these following transformations, the triangles will be congruent.
- A reflection, then a translation.
-
A rotation, then a reflection.
--------------------------
- Two triangles are congruent if they have the <u>same lengths</u> of the sides and the <u>same angles.</u>
- In a reflection, there is a rule that changes the <u>coordinates (x,y)</u>, but does <u>not </u>change <u>the lengths</u> of the sides of the triangles, thus they will still be congruent.
- A <u>reflection is also a special case of rotation</u>, thus, in a rotation, the triangles are also congruent.
- A translation is also similar to a reflection, using rules to shift the triangle up, down, left or right according to it's coordinates, not changing the sides or angles, thus congruent.
- In a dilation, the <u>lengths of the sides are changed</u>, thus, the triangles will not be congruent.
--------------------------
Thus, from the bullet points above, the correct options are:
- A reflection, then a translation.
- A rotation, then a reflection.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24267298
Oof why do you think of the most important things to do in the future and the other is a great way to get the best out of the way and I have to say that I am not a fan of 45372
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the common ratio, take the second term and divide by the first term
-14/-7 = 2
Check by dividing the third term by the second term
-28/-14 = 2
The common ratio is 2
Answer:
2x bigger
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you split the rectange in half, it would be 2x?