Plastic packaging requires oil to create it
<span>Because protons are positively charged and neutrons have no charge then it is safe to say that such an atomic model would have the positive charge concentrated in the center of an atom (option d).</span>
Answer:
Percent yield = 89.1%
Explanation:
Based on the equation:
Cl₂ + 2KI → 2KCl + I₂
<em>1 mole of Cl₂ reacts with 2 moles of KI to produce to moles of KCl</em>
<em />
To solve this quesiton we must find the moles of each reactant in order to find the limiting reactant. With the limiting reactant we can find the moles of KCl and the mass:
<em>Moles Cl₂:</em>
8x10²⁵ molecules * (1mol / 6.022x10²³ molecules) = 133 moles
<em>Moles KI -Molar mass: 166.0028g/mol-</em>
25g * (1mol / 166.0028g) = 0.15 moles
Here, clarely, the KI is the limiting reactant
As 2 moles of KI produce 2 moles of KCl, the moles of KCl produced are 0.15 moles. The theoretical mass is:
0.15 moles * (74.5513g / mol) =
11.2g KCl
Percent yield is: Actual yield (10.0g) / Theoretical yield (11.2g) * 100
<h3>Percent yield = 89.1%</h3>
Pseudo-science is not considered real science because it is not testable.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Pseudoscience primarily includes beliefs, theories or practices that are somehow incompatible with the scientific facts. The pseudoscience can’t be tested on the basis of science.
Let’s take an example of astrology. Some people believe that stars and other celestial bodies draw a significant impact on their life i.e. Good or bad thing it's just because their stars are working either in a positive or negative manner.
But, this belief doesn’t have any well-proved or authentic background over which the whole concept can rely on. Hence, pseudoscience is not taken as a real science as a lack of strong proves.
The word elliptical refers to an Oval.
