All categories

3 years ago

I need help with this question!

1 answer:

34kurt3 years ago

8 0

The definition of similar triangles says that 2 triangles are similar if they have the same shape but different size. There are two criteria to check for this:
1) If all angles in one triangle are equal to the angles in another one, then the 2 are equal.
2) If the sides have the same proportions, then the 2 triangles are similar.

1) We have that all the angles of the 2 triangles have an equal angle in the other triangle. In specific, Q is matched to B, P to A and R to C. Hence, since corresponding angles are congruent, the two triangles are similar.
2) Here we are given information about the sides of the triangles, so we will check the second criterion. We form the ratio of the largest sides of each trangle and the shortest sides. 30/5=6. For the shortest sides, 18/3=6. Finally for the middle sides, 24/4=6. Hence, we have that the triangles are similar since the ratios are equal. (it doesn't matter whether we take the bigger or the smaller side as a numerator, as long as we are consistent).

You might be interested in

Please someone help me solve this. in graphic method.

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

just graph it mate

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Is -5/12 and irrational or rational

oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Rational.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it can be put into a fraction, negative or positive it is clearly rational. Irrational numbers are numbers we can never know the true value because they repeat forever (pi for example)

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use the given information to find the p-value. Also, use a 0.05 significance level and state the conclusion about the null hyp

Hatshy [7]

Answer:

We can assume that the statistic is $z_{calc}=0.78$

$p_v = 2* P(z>0.78) = 0.435$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of interest is not different from 3/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is equal to 3/5 or not.:

Null hypothesis: $p=3/5$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 3/5$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

We can assume that the statistic is $z_{calc}=0.78$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v = 2* P(z>0.78) = 0.435$

7 0

3 years ago

Help mee on this part I’m stuck on this problem and I’m confused

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

point D = (2, -4)

Step-by-step explanation:

It's asking the dot's location.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How to explain whats 4.5 ÷ 5 =

Lerok [7]

Answer:

0.9

Step-by-step explanation:

because if you multiply 0.9 by 5 it equals 4.5, why?

well 0.9 isn't a full number it's not even 1!

If you multiply

5 × 1 = 5

so if you multiply what's smaller than 1 by 5

5 × 0.9 = 4.5

Hope this helps!

Have a nice day!

If you find my answer helpful

Pls consider marking my answer as Brainliest! It would mean a lot!

8 0

2 years ago