C. 7.8 hz I think! Hope this helped ☺️
Answer:
Assume two identical cans filled with two types of soup having same mass are rolling down on an inclined plane in same conditions. In terms of inertia different types of soup will indicate different viscosity. The higher viscosity fillings indicates more part of the soup mass is rotating together with the can’s body. This means that for the can with lower viscosity soup has a lower moment of inertia and the can with higher viscosity has higher moment of inertia while the same gravity makes them to roll.
incline angle = θ ; can's mass = m ; Radius of the can's = R , Angular acceleration for Can 1 = α1 ; Angular acceleration for Can 2 = α2
T1 = Inertia of Can with high viscosity soup
T2 = Inertia of Can with low viscosity soup
M1 rolling moment of Can 1
M2 rolling moment of Can 2
equation is given by
T1*α1 = M1 - (a)
T2*α2 = M2 - (b)
M1 = M2 = m*g*R*sin(θ). (c)
as assumed T1 > T2
from the three equation (a), (b) & (c)
the α2 > α1
Angular acceleration of Can 2 is higher than Can 1. Already stated that Can 1 has more viscous soup as compared to Can 2.
Answer:
(a) 7.315 x 10^(-14) N
(b) - 7.315 x 10^(-14) N
Explanation:
As you referred at the final remark, the electron and proton undergo a magnetic force of same magnitude but opposite direction. Using the definition of magnetic force, a cross product must be done. One technique is either calculate the magnitude of the velocity and magnetic field and multiplying by sin (90°), but it is necessary to assure both vectors are perpendicular between each other ( which is not the case) or do directly the cross product dealing with a determinant (which is the most convenient approach), thus,
(a) The electron has a velocity defined as: ![\overrightarrow{v}=(2.4x10^{6} i + 3.6x10^{6} j) \frac{[m]}{[s]}\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverrightarrow%7Bv%7D%3D%282.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%20i%20%2B%203.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%20j%29%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Bm%5D%7D%7B%5Bs%5D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C)
In respect to the magnetic field; ![\overrightarrow{B}=(0.027 i - 0.15 j) [T]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverrightarrow%7BB%7D%3D%280.027%20i%20-%200.15%20j%29%20%5BT%5D)
The magnetic force can be written as;
![\overrightarrow{F} = q(\overrightarrow{v} x \overrightarrow{B})\\ \\\\\overrightarrow{F}= q \left[\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\2.4x10^{6}&3.6x10^{6}&0\\0.027&-0.15&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%20%3D%20q%28%5Coverrightarrow%7Bv%7D%20x%20%5Coverrightarrow%7BB%7D%29%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20q%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Di%26j%26k%5C%5C2.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%263.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%260%5C%5C0.027%26-0.15%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Bear in mind
thus,
![\overrightarrow{F}= q \left[\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\2.4x10^{6}&3.6x10^{6}&0\\0.027&-0.15&0\end{array}\right]\\\\\\\overrightarrow{F}= q(2.4x10^{6}* (-0.15)- (0.027*3.6x10^{6}))\\\\\\\overrightarrow{F}= -1.6021x10^{-19} [C](-457200) [T]\frac{m}{s}\\\\\overrightarrow{F}=(7.3152x10^{-14}) k [\frac{N*m/s}{C*m/s}]\\\\|F|= \sqrt{ (7.3152x10^{-14})^{2}[N]^2 *k^{2}}\\\\F=7.3152x10^{-14} [N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20q%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Di%26j%26k%5C%5C2.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%263.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%260%5C%5C0.027%26-0.15%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20q%282.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%2A%20%28-0.15%29-%20%280.027%2A3.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%29%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20-1.6021x10%5E%7B-19%7D%20%5BC%5D%28-457200%29%20%5BT%5D%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%287.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%29%20k%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BN%2Am%2Fs%7D%7BC%2Am%2Fs%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%7CF%7C%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%287.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%29%5E%7B2%7D%5BN%5D%5E2%20%2Ak%5E%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CF%3D7.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%20%5BN%5D)
Note: The cross product is operated as a determinant. Likewise, the product of the unit vector k is squared and that is operated as dot product whose value is equal to one, i.e, 
(b) Considering the proton charge has the same magnitude as electron does, but the sign is positive, thus
![\overrightarrow{F}= q \left[\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\2.4x10^{6}&3.6x10^{6}&0\\0.027&-0.15&0\end{array}\right]\\\\\\\overrightarrow{F}= q(2.4x10^{6}* (-0.15)- (0.027*3.6x10^{6}))\\\\\\\overrightarrow{F}= 1.6021x10^{-19} [C](-457200) [T]\frac{m}{s}\\\\\overrightarrow{F}=(-7.3152x10^{-14}) k [\frac{N*m/s}{C*m/s}]\\\\|F|= \sqrt{ (-7.3152x10^{-14})^{2}[N]^2 *k^{2}}\\\\F=-7.3152x10^{-14} [N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20q%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Di%26j%26k%5C%5C2.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%263.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%260%5C%5C0.027%26-0.15%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%20q%282.4x10%5E%7B6%7D%2A%20%28-0.15%29-%20%280.027%2A3.6x10%5E%7B6%7D%29%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%201.6021x10%5E%7B-19%7D%20%5BC%5D%28-457200%29%20%5BT%5D%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Coverrightarrow%7BF%7D%3D%28-7.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%29%20k%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BN%2Am%2Fs%7D%7BC%2Am%2Fs%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%7CF%7C%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%28-7.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%29%5E%7B2%7D%5BN%5D%5E2%20%2Ak%5E%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CF%3D-7.3152x10%5E%7B-14%7D%20%5BN%5D)
Note: The cross product is operated as a determinant. Likewise, the product of the unit vector k is squared and that is operated as dot product whose value is equal to one, i.e, 
Final remarks: The cross product was performed in R3 due to the geometrical conditions of the problem.
Mendeleev watched that tellurium has compound properties like different components in its gathering, and he didn't realize that neutrons cause the more noteworthy nuclear mass. Mendeleev expressed that he anticipated that tellurium would have a lower nuclear mass than iodine.
When acceleration is constant, the average velocity is given by

where
and
are the final and initial velocities, respectively. By definition, we also have that the average velocity is given by

where
are the final/initial displacements, and
are the final/initial times, respectively.
Take the car's starting position to be at
. Then

So we have

You also could have first found the acceleration using the equation

then solve for
via

but that would have involved a bit more work, and it turns out we didn't need to know the precise value of
anyway.