Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The values on the left of the table represent the number of fish caught, and the number of the right of the table represents how many family members caught that amount of fish.
Therefore, the first row means that 0 family members caught 0 fish.
The second row means that 3 family members caught 1 fish.
The third row would mean 1 family member caught 2 fish.
The next row would mean 0 family members caught 3 fish.
And the final row would mean 4 family members caught 4 fish.
The question does not ask for the total amount of fish caught; rather is ask for the maximum number of fish that a single family member caught.
Therefore, the maximum amount of fish that a single family member catches is 4. (And 4 family members did so. But individually, the maximum amount of fish one person caught is 4).
This is 1:25 (C)
Explanation:
Answer: x=-1 y=1
Step-by-step explanation:
solve y in 3+2x-y=0
y=3+2x
sub y=3+2x into -3 -7y=10x
-14x- 24= 10x
solve x in -14x-24=10x
x= -1
sub x= -1 into y =3+2x
y=1
so therefore x= -1 and y=1
1: 40%
2: 30%
3: 20%
If we know one of the succeeded, then
1: 44.44%
2: 33.33%
3: 22.22%
If under the circumstance that they all fail to meet a strong leader, the board picks one of them at random,
1: 43.33%
2: 33.33%
3: 23.33%
The first person has a 2 in 5 chance of randomly getting a strong leader. If the first person doesn't find a strong leader, the second person has a 2/4 chance of getting a strong leader. If neither the first nor second person gets a strong leader, the third sales person has a 2/3 chance of getting a strong leader.
1: 2/5=40% Chance
2: (3/5)*(2/4)=30% Chance You have to take the probability the first rep failed to get a strong leader, then multiply by the probability the second rep gets a strong leader.
3: (3/5)*(2/4)*(2/3)=20% You have to take the probability both the other people failed, then multiply by the probability they succeeded.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The coefficient of determination =
= 0.7832
It means about 78% variation in waist size of males can be explained by their weight and about 23% can not be explained.