Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Pull him away from the fridge with a non-conducting material and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation .
<h3>What is meant by electric shock?</h3>
When a human comes into contact with an electrical energy source, they experience an electric shock. A shock is produced when electrical energy passes through a section of the body. Exposure to electrical energy has the potential to cause fatalities or absolutely no injuries.
The tangible and tangible result of an electrical current entering the body is electrical shock. The shock could be anything from a dangerous discharge from a power line to an uncomfortable but safe jolt of static electricity after walking over a thick carpet on a dry day. trauma; related topics.
The complete question is : Michael is stuck due to an electric shock generated at the fridge. What should you do to save Michael?
A. push the fridge away with a non-conducting material and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation
B. push the fridge away from him and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation
C. pull him away from the fridge with a non-conducting material and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation
D .pull him away from the fridge with your hands and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation
To learn more about electric shock refer to:
brainly.com/question/28361869
#SPJ1
Answer:
the making note cards and quizzing yourself
Explanation:
Answer:
D. System Analysis
Explanation:
System analysis can be defined as the process of analysing a problem in order to the know the cause thereby finding a way to resolve it or finding a solution to it.
System analysis enables us to easily study procedure or process thereby identifying what the objective of the procedures is which will in turn help to achieve what we needed to achieve.
System analysis is important because it enables easier identification of a problem which make us to find the best way to solve the problem since it is a problem solving technique which ensures that all problem are been resolved accurately and efficiently
