Answer:
observed.
Ballard is lead author of a study accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal that used this method and observations from the Kepler Space Telescope to learn the nature of the distant star Kepler-61.
Our understanding of the size and temperature of planets depends crucially on the size and temperature of the stars they orbit. Astronomers already have a robust way to discern the physical properties of solar-type stars — those like the sun — by measuring the light they emit at different wavelengths and matching that to synthetically created spectra.
“The challenge is that small stars are incredibly difficult to characterize,” Ballard said. Those theoretical methods don’t work well for what are called M-dwarf stars, lower-mass stars about half the size of the sun and smaller — which is too bad, because such stars make up about three-quarters of the universe.
Ballard is using the characterization by proxy method to try to fill this knowledge gap. She is building on what she calls “truly remarkable” work by astronomer Tabetha Boyajian, now at Yale University, who uses a near-infrared interferometer — an array of telescopes working in unison studying light wavelengths a bit longer than visible light — to resolve the physical size of relatively nearby stars.
Ballard said her characterization by proxy method takes “full advantage that there now exists this precious sample” of relatively nearby stars that have been directly measured. You could say the method borrows a bit from Greek mathematician Euclid, whose first “common notion” held that things that equal the same thing must necessarily also equal each other.
In the new paper, Ballard and co-authors used this reasoning to learn about Kepler-61b, a planet orbiting near the inner edge of the habitable zone of the distant, low-mass star Kepler-61, about 900 light-years away in the Cygnus Constellation. A star’s habitable zone is that swath of space just right for an orbiting planet’s surface water to be in liquid form, thus giving life a chance.
She did this by comparing it to temperature size averages from four spectroscopically similar stars between 12 and 25 light-years away in the Ursa Major and Cygnus constellations. A light-year is about 6 trillion miles.
A funny thing also happened along the way: Kepler-61 turned out to be bigger and hotter than expected, which in turn recalibrated planet Kepler-61b’s relative size upward as well — meaning it, too, would be hotter than previously thought and no longer a resident of the star’s habitable zone.
All of this caused Ballard to informally subtitle the paper, “How Nearby Stars Bumped a Planet out of the Habitable Zone.”
Funding for the research came from NASA and its Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology
Explanation:
hope it will help you
