The supreme court is the U.S and courts decision
A person would likely hesitate a job with a prestige and high salary in a hospital located in high crime rate because of the fact that being in area with a high crime rate means that there are dangerous things that occur in that particular area in which means that it isn't recognized to be an area safe for a person to live to and by that, why would a person take on a job that isn't even safe for him or her to live on?
Spirituality describe the J Hudson Taylor's "faith principle" because he believes that nothing can satisfy the person will except having faith in Jesus and reading bible on daily basis can cause the true source of extraordinary power in the humans. However, he believed that transformation in the humans could be only possible through the spiritual principles which could promote holy living and uplift the world from human sufferings.
A statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chancea statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chance.this is a true statement.
Statistical significance provides a cut-off value for determining whether a sample's results and observable effects are primarily due to screening and accurately represent the characteristics of the study population.This significance threshold is often 0.05-5%, regardless of the need for documentation. This is because the implications of our findings recognize the importance of both Type I and Type II errors. When we say that a result is "statistically significant", we mean it is statistically significantly different from 0.
There is usually a null hypothesis that the parameter is equal to zero. Through statistical analysis, tests can be performed to prove that such parameters are statistically significantly different from zero. Therefore, you should know that this value is statistically significantly different from 0 when viewed in text.
Learn more about statistical significance here:
brainly.com/question/15848236
#SPJ4
Answer:
Both are correct
Explanation:
It is nature-nurture controversy or debate which focuses on an individual's personal behavioral traits to be a product or result of either genetics inheritance or acquired influences.
On one side, some psychologist and other natural sciences argue that behavioral traits and characteristics of a person can be explained by genetics as nature is per- wiring.
On the other hand, other social sciences and sociologist argues that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction and nurture.
Thus both genetics and human interaction and environment contributes to the human behavior.
Therefore, both the views are correct.
