All of these would be perfectly fine represented by a pie chart except A, which doesn't add to 100%.
The question seems to be getting at the idea that a pie chart might be better when the slices are all visually different sizes. I don't really think that's right; a pie chart for D say, where the two slices are about the same, gives the correct impression of the relative frequencies, which are about the same.
Answer they're looking for: C
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the anwser to number 7 is d or (x2-4) (x2+4)
by the way try using the app called Photo Math i use it for my test it works greatyou should try it some day.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can conclude that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI, because you can see/interpret that there all the angles are congruent with one another, like with vertical angles (∠GIH and ∠KIJ) and alternate interior angles (∠H and ∠J, ∠G and ∠K).
We also know that we have two congruent sides, since it provides the information that line GK bisects line HJ, meaning that they have been split evenly (they have been split, with even/same lengths).
<u><em>So now we have three congruent angles, and two congruent sides. This is enough to prove that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI,</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
4 out of 10 because the amount of prime numbers from 1- 10 is
2, 3, 5, and 7.
Hope this helps!