All categories

2 years ago

Explain why molten sodium chloride conducts electricity,but solid sodium chloride does not

Chemistry

1 answer:

KatRina [158]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

because molten sodium gives electricity too choloride

You might be interested in

What are the disadvantages of aluminium fir building cars

Wittaler [7]

Disadvantages of aluminum in building cars include:

On average, aluminum is more expensive than steel, as much as two to three times.

Aluminum is not easily welded. If a steel door or panel suffers a crack, often it cam be welded back together easily, primed and repainted so its difficult to tell any body work has been performed. This cannot be done with aluminum. Steel also can be bent and shaped as needed.

Body shops and even dealer service centers are currently equipped for steel work with technicians skilled in the art of welding and steel fabrication. The cost of switching over to an infra structure designed specifically for all-aluminum vehicles or mass production of aluminum vehicles and components would be high.

4 0

3 years ago

Grease is applied to the moving part of machine.

RideAnS [48]

Answer:

Explanation:

The moving part won't move on its own there's a force but the force isn't enough for something like a bike chain it need grease to move smoothly or else it will just be super stuck or slow.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Calculate the empirical formula for each stimulant based on its elemental mass percent composition. a. nicotine (found in tobacc

Ira Lisetskai [31]

This an incomplete question, here is a complete question.

Calculate the empirical formula for each stimulant based on its elemental mass percent composition.

a. nicotine (found in tobacco leaves): C 74.03%, H 8.70%, N 17.27%

b. caffeine (found in coffee beans): C 49.48%, H 5.19 %, N 28.85% and O 16.48%

Answer:

(a) The empirical formula for the given compound is $C_5H_7N$

(b) The empirical formula for the given compound is $C_4H_5N_2O$

Explanation:

Part A: nicotine

We are given:

Percentage of C = 74.03 %

Percentage of H = 8.70 %

Percentage of N = 17.27 %

Let the mass of compound be 100 g. So, percentages given are taken as mass.

Mass of C = 74.03 g

Mass of H = 8.70 g

Mass of N = 17.27 g

To formulate the empirical formula, we need to follow some steps:

Step 1: Converting the given masses into moles.

Moles of Carbon = $\frac{\text{Given mass of Carbon}}{\text{Molar mass of Carbon}}=\frac{74.03g}{12g/mole}=6.17moles$

Moles of Hydrogen = $\frac{\text{Given mass of Hydrogen}}{\text{Molar mass of Hydrogen}}=\frac{8.70g}{1g/mole}=8.70moles$

Moles of Nitrogen = $\frac{\text{Given mass of nitrogen}}{\text{Molar mass of nitrogen}}=\frac{17.27g}{14g/mole}=1.23moles$

Step 2: Calculating the mole ratio of the given elements.

For the mole ratio, we divide each value of the moles by the smallest number of moles calculated which is 1.23 moles.

For Carbon = $\frac{6.17}{1.23}=5.01\approx 5$

For Hydrogen = $\frac{8.70}{1.23}=7.07\approx 7$

For Nitrogen = $\frac{1.23}{1.23}=1$

Step 3: Taking the mole ratio as their subscripts.

The ratio of C : H : N = 5 : 7 : 1

The empirical formula for the given compound is $C_5H_7N_1=C_5H_7N$

Part B: caffeine

We are given:

Percentage of C = 49.48 %

Percentage of H = 5.19 %

Percentage of N = 28.85 %

Percentage of O = 16.48 %

Let the mass of compound be 100 g. So, percentages given are taken as mass.

Mass of C = 49.48 g

Mass of H = 5.19 g

Mass of N = 28.85 g

Mass of O = 16.48 g

To formulate the empirical formula, we need to follow some steps:

Step 1: Converting the given masses into moles.

Moles of Carbon = $\frac{\text{Given mass of Carbon}}{\text{Molar mass of Carbon}}=\frac{49.48g}{12g/mole}=4.12moles$

Moles of Hydrogen = $\frac{\text{Given mass of Hydrogen}}{\text{Molar mass of Hydrogen}}=\frac{5.19g}{1g/mole}=5.19moles$

Moles of Nitrogen = $\frac{\text{Given mass of nitrogen}}{\text{Molar mass of nitrogen}}=\frac{28.85g}{14g/mole}=2.06moles$

Moles of Oxygen = $\frac{\text{Given mass of oxygen}}{\text{Molar mass of oxygen}}=\frac{16.48g}{16g/mole}=1.03moles$

Step 2: Calculating the mole ratio of the given elements.

For the mole ratio, we divide each value of the moles by the smallest number of moles calculated which is 1.03 moles.

For Carbon = $\frac{4.12}{1.03}=4$

For Hydrogen = $\frac{5.19}{1.03}=5.03\approx 5$

For Nitrogen = $\frac{2.06}{1.03}=2$

For Nitrogen = $\frac{1.03}{1.03}=1$

Step 3: Taking the mole ratio as their subscripts.

The ratio of C : H : N : O = 4 : 5 : 2 : 1

The empirical formula for the given compound is $C_4H_5N_2O_1=C_4H_5N_2O$

6 0

3 years ago

Assume the following potential energies for a Newman projection: anti Me/H or anti Me/Me = 0 kcal/mole; eclipsed H/H = 4 kcal/mo

kap26 [50]

Answer:

0 kcal/mole

Explanation:

The most stable Newman projection corresponds to the minimum potential energy: Answer (e) 0 kcal/mole

4 0

2 years ago

A 52.0 g of Copper (specific heat=0.0923cal/gC) at 25.0C is warmed by the addition of 299 calories of energy. find the final tem

Leto [7]

Answer : The final temperature of the copper is, $87.29^oC$

Solution :

Formula used :

$Q=m\times c\times \Delta T=m\times c\times (T_{final}-T_{initial})$

where,

Q = heat gained = 299 cal

m = mass of copper = 52 g

c = specific heat of copper = $0.0923cal/g^oC$

$\Delta T=\text{Change in temperature}$

$T_{final}$ = final temperature = ?

$T_{initial}$ = initial temperature = $25^oC$

Now put all the given values in the above formula, we get the final temperature of copper.

$299cal=52g\times 0.0923cal/g^oC\times (T_{final}-25^oC)$

$T_{final}=87.29^oC$

Therefore, the final temperature of the copper is, $87.29^oC$

4 0

3 years ago

Explain why molten sodium chloride conducts electricity,but solid sodium chloride does not​

Explain why molten sodium chloride conducts electricity,but solid sodium chloride does not