1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
raketka [301]
2 years ago
7

Fill in the missing statements and reasons in this proof. Number your reasons 1 through 5 as they would be shown in the chart be

low.
Given: m∠LOM = m∠JKI;
m∠MON = m∠IKH
Prove: m∠LON = m∠HKJ

I have an answer written down but i'm not sure if I am right. I require assistance because proofs are confusing

Mathematics
1 answer:
deff fn [24]2 years ago
6 0

Using the above conditions ; If m ∠LOM = m ∠JKI,  if m ∠MON = m ∠IKH it is proved below that m ∠LON = m ∠HKJ as are congruent angles.

<h3>What are congruent angles about?</h3>

An angle is known to be Congruent if its angles do have equal measure."

Note that question, In the said figure of the angles (image attached),

m ∠LOM = m ∠JKI  (congruent angles)              taken as 1      

m ∠MON = m ∠IKH  (congruent angles)             taken as 2  

The one should sum up both the side angle  of m ∠MON in (1) we obtain;

m ∠LOM + m ∠MON = m ∠JKI + m ∠MON

Then one should replace angle  m ∠MON = m ∠IKH from (eqn. 2)  on right hand side and then it will be:

m ∠LOM + m ∠MON = m ∠JKI + m ∠IKH      taken as (3)

Then:

m ∠LOM + m ∠MON = m ∠LON  ( M is said to be the interior point of ∠LON)    taken as (4)

Since m ∠JKI + m ∠IKH = m ∠HKJ  ( I is said to be the interior point of ∠HKJ)            taken as number (5)

Using Number (3) , (4) and (5)  in the image attached, we obtained:

m ∠LON = m ∠HKJ  (Congruent angles)

Therefore, Using the above conditions ; If m ∠LOM = m ∠JKI,  if m ∠MON = m ∠IKH it is proved below that m ∠LON = m ∠HKJ as are congruent angles.

Learn more about Congruent angles here

brainly.com/question/24997046

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which pair<br> angles must be supplementary?<br> 21<br> 5<br> 3 4
Keith_Richards [23]

4 and 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Supplementary means the angle is 180 degrees so 4 is the only complete obvious 180 degree angle and 1 just cause i know it can't be 5.

4 0
3 years ago
True or false? if false why
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

False.

The point on the opposite side is not necessarily the midpoint of the opposite side. In fact, the the point does not even have to be on the opposite side.

The altitude of a triangle is a segment whose endpoints are a vertex of the triangle and a point on the line containing the opposite side such that the altitude is perpendicular to that line.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the least common denominator (LCD) of 1/3 and 3/4
Len [333]
D. because 3 and 4 don't both go into any other number besides 12, they don't go into 3, 4 or 7, so its 12.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sinx + cosx= 1 then find the value of x
Kobotan [32]
   1√2sinx+1√2cosx=1√2.&#10;&#10;This can be written as&#10;&#10;cos(x−π4)=cos(π4)&#10;&#10;The general solution of this equation ls&#10;&#10;x−.π4=2nπ±π4,n=0,±1,±2,...,&#10;&#10;So, x=2nπandx=(4n+1)π2,n=0,±1,±2,±3....&#10;&#10; ANSWER: x=2nπandx=(4n+1)π2,n=0,±1,±2,±3....


<span><span /></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Can you find a strategy for splitting any number so that you always get the largest product?
Alex

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  split the number into equal pieces

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming "splitting any number" means identifying parts that have the number as their sum, the maximum product of the parts will be found where the parts all have equal values.

We have to assume that the number being split is positive and all of the parts are positive.

<h3>2 parts</h3>

If we divide number n into parts x and (n -x), their product is the quadratic function x(n -x). The graph of this function opens downward and has zeros at x=0 and x=n. The vertex (maximum product) is halfway between the zeros, at x = (0 + n)/2 = n/2.

<h3>3 parts</h3>

Similarly, we can look at how to divide a (positive) number into 3 parts that have the largest product. Let's assume that one part is x. Then the other two parts will have a maximum product when they are equal. Their values will be (n-x)/2, and their product will be ((n -x)/2)^2. Then the product of the three numbers is ...

  p = x(x^2 -2nx +n^2)/4 = (x^3 -2nx^2 +xn^2)/4

This will be maximized where its derivative is zero:

  p' = (1/4)(3x^2 -4nx +n^2) = 0

  (3x -n)(x -n) = 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . factor

  x = n/3  or  n

We know that x=n will give a minimum product (0), so the maximum product is obtained when x = n/3.

<h3>more parts</h3>

A similar development can prove by induction that the parts must all be equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A rectangular door measures 2.5m by 1m. How long is the diagonal of the door
    15·1 answer
  • What is x when 1/7 + x = 2/3x
    10·2 answers
  • The conversion of a temperature from Celsius to Fahrenheit is represented by the expression below, where C is the temperature in
    10·1 answer
  • (6x^3+18x^2)-3x^2<br><br>please help me!
    9·2 answers
  • What is the additive inverse of 1?​
    13·2 answers
  • How many positive integers less than 1,000 do not have 7 as any digit?
    7·1 answer
  • A colonoscopy is a screening test for colon cancer, recommended as a routine test for adults over age 50. A new study provides t
    11·1 answer
  • Find the slope of the line on the graph below
    13·1 answer
  • What word is the same flipped backwards , forwards and had 4 letters?
    5·2 answers
  • Plz help guys.I rlly need it
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!