This stament is true in my opinion because in order to make a story you have to go by the steps so like you have to write a rough draft
Answer:
The explanation of that situation is below.
Explanation:
To begin with, the most important factor to have in mind in the situation explained above is the fact that we are talking about a "luxury good" and therefore that when it comes to this type of goods is better when the majority of the people do not possess or at least they must represent the fact that they are exclusive for only some part of the population. That is why that those goods use the strategy of increase always the price because that will means that they are not affordable for the majority of the society but only for a few and that will give to the owner of the good a sense of uniqueness and with that it also comes the sense of superiority. That is why that when it comes to this type of good the analysis change and it collides with the other theory of utility maximation.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
The correct sequence of crossing include:
<em>First, the Analyst takes the flashlight and crosses the bridge with the Associate. This takes 2 minutes. </em>The Analyst then returns across the bridge with the flashlight taking 1 more minute (3 minutes passed so far). The Analyst gives the flashlight to the VP and the VP and MD cross together taking 10 minutes (13 minutes passed so far).
The VP gives the flashlight to the Associate, who recrosses the bridge taking 2 minutes (15 minutes passed so far). The Analyst and Associate now cross the bridge together taking 2 more minutes.<em> Now, all are across the bridge at the meeting in exactly 17 minutes.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The above is the only logical way through which all of them could be able to cross the bridge while still arriving to the meeting at/on the exact time.
<u>Answer:</u> A. Moral relativism
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moral relativism means the moral judgement made by people based on their differences such as culture or country, it denotes that there is no one method where people can decide what is right and what is wrong.
The four types of moral relativism are naive relativism, cultural relativism, role relativism and social relativism. Naive relativism means individuals can have own moral values. Cultural relativism means people should not judge based on one's culture. Role relativism means a person with job role should not make judgments on others beliefs.
