South America has diverse agricultural products, vast mineral wealth, and plentiful freshwater. It also has rich fisheries and ports on three bodies of water.
The statement that best describes one of Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms is Plato's Forms are material obiects.
<h3>How can the
Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms be described?</h3>
The Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms was base on the rejection of the theory behind the form but not the notion, since Aristotle believe that for every form that is been seen in existence, then there is something that form it.
In conclusion, Aristotle believe that no form is independent, hence he criticize the Plato's Forms by saying it is material obiects which makes the first option to be correct.
Therefore, the option A is correct.
Learn more about Aristotle at:
brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1
Hmmm. Transitory? Im stumped.
The answer is: A. It is aligned with values, challenging objectivity.
Action research is a form of research that conducted by offering some sort of progressive solutions to the communities that are experiencing some sort of problems. (such as hate groups, vandalism, etc)
While the intention might be good, action research is undeniable based on value, since the solutions that offered by the researchers would only based on what the researchers think as morally right. This will create a bias in the way their view the result of their research.
Answer:
The six big ideas are:
Limited government. - is still relevant because a too powerful government can be a threat to the people, as it has been seen in history many times.
Republicanism - is still relevant because the United States is a republic, where government is a public matter, and is obliged to respond to the people. The people also have the right to change and remove the government if they feel it is not working for the common benefit.
Checks and balances - is still relevant. The three branches of government: the executive (president), legislative (congress), and judicial (the courts including the Supreme Court) all have checks and balances. Each branch checks the power of the other two, and this prevents any of the three from becoming too powerful.
Federalism - The U.S. is a federal republic, therefore, it is still relevant. This is why the federal government only has those powers explicetly given to it by the constitution, while everything else is left up to the states.
Separation of powers - Is still relevant and related to the principle of checks and balances. The U.S. is a republic where government has three separated powers or branches, the executive, the legislative, and the judiciary.
Popular sovereignty - is still relevant. In a republic, the people are the ones who really control the government, who elect the government, and who can remove and change the government. This is popular sovereignty.
