Answer:
valence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario best illustrates the factor of valence. In the context of psychology this term refers to the attractiveness or adverseness of a situation, event or object. Which in this case would be Cynthia's one month leave, which depending on which perspective you take (Cynthia's or her Boss') it may either be viewed as good or bad.
Answer:
I d speak this language sorry <3
Answer:
The correct option is E,Ted's annuity has a higher present value than Allison's
Explanation:
Both annuities do not have equal amount today as $1000 received today is higher in value terms than $1000 receivable in a month's time since cash receivable earlier is much more valued than the one receivable later.
Ted's annuity is an annuity due not an ordinary annuity
Allison's annuity is an ordinary annuity not annuity due
Allison's annuity has a lower present value than Ted's and not the other way round.
The only correct statement is option E,since Ted is expected to receive $1000 today, his annuity has a higher present value compared to Allison's
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
