thanks again and have to go to the store and get some rest I will be there at puno my phone is not working and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about the week and I have a few questions about you
Both electric and magnetic fields
A wave can be described as the disturbance of particles in an area. Think about it this way: particles (matter) carry energy. For all the laws of physics to work, this energy must be "traded" somehow. This happens by miniscule vibrations in the particles, which are apparent disturbances. This creates a wave, and therefore a wave is, indeed, a disturbance.<span />
They are both right because you can note both things, I mean Raphael and Lucinda, both has a right statement or explanation about the wave. Wave by nothing is both for its wavelength and for its frequency. So Raphael and Lucinda are both correct because you can note both wavelength and frequency.
Magma that cools and forms