Economic independence for women. In cultures where women cannot own property and have few of the rights required to survive independently, women are forced to remain under the headship of violent men who rule their household. Likewise, the children are also trapped in that household. And in countries where women do not have guardianship rights over children, those women who do flee domestic violence often leave the children behind.
Parenting classes and early childhood resources. A lot of domestic violence comes from stress and from repeating behaviors that were learned in childhood. When young parents don't understand typical childhood development and haven't had positive parenting methods modeled for them, the behaviors of typical children quickly become overwhelming for the parents and a default to the panicked, angry violence that they grew up in. The parents need education and the opportunity to build positive instead of negative parenting habits in the face of life's challenges. They also need access to affordable childcare and to screening and early intervention for the children who are not developing typically.
<span>If the government wanted to stimulate more
savings,
it should <span>
pay a higher percentage on US Savings Bonds.</span></span>
United States savings bonds are debt
securities allotted by the United States Dept. of the Treasury to support compensation
for the U.S. government's debt needs. US savings bonds are viewed as one of the
most secure reserves since they are sponsored by the full confidence and credit
of the United States government.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>