1s^2, 2s^2, 2p^6, 3s^2, 3p^6, 3d^5, 4s^1
Chromium is strange because it moves on to the 4s orbital instead of filling the 3d orbital with that last electron. Tricky.
Mark as brainliest if this helped! :)
Answer:
4.5 g/L.
Explanation:
- To solve this problem, we must mention Henry's law.
- Henry's law states that at a constant temperature, the amount of a given gas dissolved in a given type and volume of liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of that gas in equilibrium with that liquid.
- It can be expressed as: P = KS,
P is the partial pressure of the gas above the solution.
K is the Henry's law constant,
S is the solubility of the gas.
- At two different pressures, we have two different solubilities of the gas.
<em>∴ P₁S₂ = P₂S₁.</em>
P₁ = 525.0 kPa & S₁ = 10.5 g/L.
P₂ = 225.0 kPa & S₂ = ??? g/L.
∴ S₂ = P₂S₁/P₁ = (225.0 kPa)(10.5 g/L) / (525.0 kPa) = 4.5 g/L.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
Light is a form of energy. Both ultraviolet light and xrays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
As was said in the question, ultraviolet rays is absorbed by the rubber. We must know that prolonged exposure of this piece of rubber to incident ultraviolet light causes the vaporization of volatile materials in the rubber.
When volatile materials in the rubber vaporize, the rubber can become solid. Thus, ultraviolet light can cause rubber to become solid.
However, not all types of light can do this hence it does matter the type of light that falls on the rubber material.
This is a straightforward dilution calculation that can be done using the equation
where <em>M</em>₁ and <em>M</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) molar concentrations of the solution, respectively, and <em>V</em>₁ and <em>V</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) volumes of the solution, respectively.
Here, we have the initial concentration (<em>M</em>₁) and the initial (<em>V</em>₁) and final (<em>V</em>₂) volumes, and we want to find the final concentration (<em>M</em>₂), or the concentration of the solution after dilution. So, we can rearrange our equation to solve for <em>M</em>₂:
Substituting in our values, we get
![\[M_2=\frac{\left ( 50 \text{ mL} \right )\left ( 0.235 \text{ M} \right )}{\left ( 200.0 \text{ mL} \right )}= 0.05875 \text{ M}\].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5BM_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cleft%20%28%2050%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5Cleft%20%28%200.235%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20200.0%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%3D%200.05875%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%5C%5D.)
So the concentration of the diluted solution is 0.05875 M. You can round that value if necessary according to the appropriate number of sig figs. Note that we don't have to convert our volumes from mL to L since their conversion factors would cancel out anyway; what's important is the ratio of the volumes, which would be the same whether they're presented in milliliters or liters.
That's false. Because, the molecules in a solid are compacted too tightly together that they don't have all that extra space that a gas would. Molecules in a gas would have more thermal energy because they have all that space to move around in. The more they move around, the hotter it gets. The less that they move around, and the more that they put and packed together, the colder it's going to be.
Hope this helped you!! (:
