The answer is D. $600. In general, the employee discount didn't result in taxable income to the recipient. The amount that may be excluded in relation to services purchased by employees, however, is limited to 20% of the amount normally charged to non-employee customers. As a result, Norbert would be able to exclude an employee discount up to 20% x $2,000 or $400 with the remaining $600 included in gross income.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Total costs = Product costs + Administrative costs
= ($75 × 30,000) + $85,000 - ($50 × 30,000) + $65,000 = $3,900,000
Total cost per unit =Total cost / Units expected to be sold= $3,900,000 /30,000 = $130
Markup per unit = Total cost per unit × Markup percentage = $130.00 × 25% = $32.5
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C. Reducing deposits and reserves by $5 million.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
-    Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
-   Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.