1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AfilCa [17]
1 year ago
13

A) Use the definition of Laplace transform to find L{f }. (Do the integrals.) For what values of s is L{f } defined?f(t) = (2t+1

)
Mathematics
1 answer:
kiruha [24]1 year ago
8 0

For the given function f(t) = (2t + 1) using definition of Laplace transform the required solution is L(f(t))s = [ ( 2/s²) + ( 1/s) ].

As given in the question,

Given function is equal to :

f(t) = 2t + 1

Simplify the given function using definition of Laplace transform we have,

L(f(t))s = \int\limits^\infty_0 {f(t)e^{-st} } \, dt

          =  \int\limits^\infty_0[2t +1] e^{-st} dt

          = 2\int\limits^\infty_0 te^{-st} + \int\limits^\infty_0e^{-st} dt

         = 2 L(t) + L(1)

L(1) = \int\limits^\infty_0e^{-st} dt

     = (-1/s) ( 0 -1 )

     = 1/s , ( s >  0)

2L ( t ) = 2\int\limits^\infty_0 te^{-st}

        =  2[t\int\limits^\infty_0 e^{-st} - \int\limits^\infty_0 ({(d/dt)(t) \int\limits^\infty_0e^{-st} \, dt )dt]

        =  2/ s²

Now ,

L(f(t))s = 2 L(t) + L(1)

          = 2/ s² + 1/s

Therefore, the solution of the given function using Laplace transform the required solution is L(f(t))s = [ ( 2/s²) + ( 1/s) ].

Learn more about Laplace transform here

brainly.com/question/14487937

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
brian and shawna are selling cookie dough. ryan sold 6 packod cookie dough and 12 packages of gingerbread cookies dough for a to
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

Chocolate chip dough = $12

Gingerbread cookie dough = $17

Step-by-step explanation:

Since there are two variables in this problem, setting up a system of equations and using the elimination method will help us find the cost for each package of cookie dough.  Based on Ryan's sales of 6 packages of chocolate chip and 12 packages of gingerbread for $276, the first equation is:

6c + 12g = 276

Since Shawna sold 8 chocolate chip and 3 gingerbread for a total of $147.00, the second equation is:

8c + 3g = 147

Using the elimination method, we will need to multiply the second equation by a factor of -4 in order to eliminate the variable 'g':

-4(8c + 3g = 147) = -32c - 12g = -588

Add the two equations:

6c + 12g = 276

+ <u> -32c - 12g = -588</u>

-26c = -312  or c = $12

Plug the value of 'c' into the first equation:

6(12) + 12g = 276 or 72 + 12g = 276 or g = $17

8 0
3 years ago
What is the answer to this multiplication problem 650*3456
Roman55 [17]
650 * 3456 = 2,246,400 is the answer.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the rectangle below ac=48 units what is de
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter o
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

Part 1) The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor (see the explanation)

Part 2) The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures (see the explanation)

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its perimeters is equal to the scale factor

so

The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor

Part 2) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the area of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared

so

The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) What would happen to the perimeter and area of a figure if the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally? For example, if the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the  width did not change? Or if the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?​

we know that

If the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally, then the ratio of the corresponding sides of the new figure and the original figure are not proportional

That means

The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures

therefore

Corresponding sides are not proportional and corresponding angles are not congruent

so

<em>A) If the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the  width did not change?</em>

<em>Perimeter</em>

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2W ----> P=6L+2W

The perimeter of the new figure is greater than the perimeter of the original figure but are not proportionals

<u>Area</u>

The original area is A=LW

The new area  would be A=(3L)(W) ----> A=3LW

The area of the new figure is three times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

<em>B) If the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?</em>

<u>Perimeter</u>

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2(W/4) ----> P=6L+W/2

The perimeter of the new figure and the perimeter of the original figure are not proportionals

<u><em>Area</em></u>

The original area is A=LW

The new area  would be A=(3L)(W/4) ----> A=(3/4)LW

The area of the new figure is three-fourth times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

4 0
3 years ago
What is the exponent for 23,000 when writen in scientific notation​
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

2.3 x 10⁴

Step-by-step explanation:

23000 is the number. You need the decimal to be in between the two whole numbers that aren't 0.

2.3 <

2.3 x 10, the exponent after the ten has to move the decimal to the original number of spaces in the original number 23000.

In 23000 its 4 places so your answer would be

2.3 x 10⁴

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jill is factoring the expression 13XY -52y. Her work is shown below
    7·1 answer
  • Write the standard form of the equation of each line. How do I find the slope and y-intercept with the graph for problem 6???
    11·1 answer
  • I already solved this problem. I just need help with the HINT part.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following choices is equivalent to 1 + 8(2x + 3)?
    14·1 answer
  • Help please!<br>figure out the "inflection point" of the following function<br>f(x)=5x³ + 2x² − 3x​
    10·2 answers
  • A rotating sprinkler that sprays water at a radius of 7 feet is used to water a lawn. Determine the area of the lawn that is bei
    12·1 answer
  • BRAINLYEST ANSWER
    13·1 answer
  • Please do this I am begging u
    7·2 answers
  • A display case of video games is marked 1 for $12. If Erin has $216, how many video games can Erin get? (Assume no tax or other
    8·2 answers
  • A square with diagonals is shown. the distance from one point to the middle point is x. the length from the center point to anot
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!