Answer:
Growth rate
Explanation:
The responding variable, also known as the DEPENDENT VARIABLE, is the variable that responds to changes or manipulations made to another variable (independent or manipulable variable) in the experiment. It is the measured variable of an experiment.
According to the hypothesis provided for this investigation, the scientist wants to determine if the amount of fertilizer plants of the same species receive will affect their growth rate when planted in the same condition. This shows that the independent variable is the amount of fertilizer to be used while the RESPONDING VARIABLE OR DEPENDENT VARIABLE is the GROWTH RATE OF THE PLANTS because it responds to the amount of fertilizer.
Classification systems are mental models that we create to make sorting things simpler and more efficient. We make compromises to emphasize certain details and hide others based on their perceived relevance to achieving the outcomes we seek. Even if the original model was nearly perfect, you should expect the inputs provided and outcomes desired to change as time goes by.
In time, we usually find that we have over-simplified by ignoring important details. Mental models such as classification systems should evolve over time. This enables them to more accurately reflect reality and lead to the outcomes we seek.
You can only find the details you seek by observing the right layer of abstraction.
Answer:
Percent yield of carbon monoxide is approximately 38%.
Explanation:
Given reaction : C + SiO₂ → Si + CO
On balancing it : 2C + SiO₂ → Si + 2CO
⇒ 2 mole of carbon produces 2 mole of carbon monoxide
or 2×12=24 g of carbon produces 2×(12+16)=56 g of carbon monoxide
⇒ Expected yield of carbon monoxide when 32.5g of carbon is heated with silicon dioxide is 32.5×
⇒ Expected yield = 
= 75.8 g
Actual yield is given as 28.8 g
⇒ The percent yield of carbon monoxide = 
×100
= 
×100
≅<u>38%</u>
Answer:
6.5256×10¹⁴
Explanation:
n= v/24
v= n×25
v= 2.719×10¹³ × 24= 6.5256×10¹⁴ moles/dm³
hope it helps! please mark me brainliest
thank you! have a good day ahead
if u follow me, I will follow u back
Due to electronegativity difference between H and F atom.
<h3>
What is the reason for the difference ?</h3>
- The bond length of HF is 92 pm. It is 16% shorter than the sum of the covalent radii of H (37 pm) and F (72 pm).
- The shorter of the bond length is due to the difference in electronegativity between H and F atom. The electronegativity of F is 4.0, whereas the electronegativity of H is 2.1.
- Greater the difference of electronegativity between the bonded atoms, shorter will be the bond length.
- As becomes smaller i.e. as we proceed from HF to HI, this effect becomes lessens and bond length will be more predictable.
Thus from the above conclusion we can say the difference in electronegativity between H and F atom this is the reason for shorter bond length of HF.
Learn more about bond length here :
brainly.com/question/13683866
#SPJ4
