Answer:
The distance traveled by the woman is 34.1m
Explanation:
Given
The initial height of the cliff
yo = 45m final, positition y = 0m bottom of the cliff
y = yo + ut -1/2gt²
u = 20.0m/s initial speed
g = 9.80m/s²
0 = 45.0 + 20×t –1/2×9.8×t²
0 = 45 +20t –4.9t²
Solving quadratically or by using a calculator,
t = 5.69s and –1.61s byt time cannot be negative so t = 5.69s
So this is the total time it takes for the ball to reach the ground from the height it was thrown.
The distance traveled by the woman is
s = vt
Given the speed of the woman v = 6.00m/s
Therefore
s = 6.00×5.69 = 34.14m
Approximately 34.1m to 3 significant figures.
Answer:
2,4,5
Air pressure is created by the weight of the atmosphere pushing on Earth’s surface.
Denser air is heavier than less dense air.
Air is less dense at higher altitudes.
D is correct answer.Momentum it depends to acceleration and velocity, and inertia only depends on velocity.
Hope it helped.
-Charlie
Light travels in electromagnetic waves in the form of photons. What do photons travel in? Can a frequency have weight? Carry weight? According to Einstien a photon with energy proportional to its frequency basically explains ultraviolet light(among other things), so does that mean light travels within a "larger" version of itself?
We know that light doesn't need a medium through which to travel because the speed of light is experimentally constant: independent of the movement of the source or detector or the direction in which it travels.
Light contrasts with sound, which travels through the air (or some other material medium). If you're stationary with respect to the air, then the speed of sound is the same in all directions. But if you're moving with respect to the air, the speed of sound will be the same in all directions relative to the air---which means that sound coming up in front of you will seem faster and sound catching up to you from behind will seem slower.
If light were a disturbance in a medium, it would exhibit the same behaviour. But light never does---its speed is the same under all circumstances. So it does you no good to postulate an aether. You can still do it, but it makes the theory more complicated than necessary. The only reason to postulate an aether is that you're uncomfortable with the idea of waves not needing a medium. But our modern understanding of quantum mechanics is that all kinds of particles have a wavelike nature, so, if you accept that matter can travel through empty space, you should have no problem accepting the same for light.
so it's true
Since work involves force moved through a distance, none of them technically does ANY work.