1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
statuscvo [17]
11 months ago
9

Both retinal disparity and convergence increase as an object gets closer to the individual. please select the best answer from t

he choices provided t f
Social Studies
1 answer:
ioda11 months ago
3 0

The right answer is True. It is known as binocular or retinal disparity to the slight difference between the two points of view provided by both eyes.

Retinal disparity increases as the eyes get closer to an object. The brain uses retinal disparity to estimate the distance between the viewer and the object being viewed. Convergence is when the eyes turn inward to look at an object close up.

Retinal disparity is a binocular cue used to perceive depth between two near objects. It does so by comparing the different images from both retinas. Each eye receives different images because they are usually around two and a half inches apart.

Learn more about retinal disparity here

brainly.com/question/5854936

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
A guest in your restaurant leaves angry because his steak was incorrectly cooked. He has a wreck on the way home injuring himsel
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

Proximate cause

Explanation:

As it relates to law, proximate cause refers to something or an event that happened that causes some things or another event to occur. The court can deem an event to have been the actually cause of an injury even though the injury didn't occur at the place of the injury. In other words, the injury might not have happened if the event or action didn't happen; the event might not be a sufficient condition for the injury to occur, but it is a necessary condition.

4 0
3 years ago
The long-term goal of the laia (latin american integration association), better known by its spanish acronym, aladi, is:
Law Incorporation [45]
I believe the answer is: <span>to establish a Latin American common market.
They aimed to create an equivalent of  North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) for nations in latin america.
From the total of 20 Latin American countries, LAIA managed to absorb 13 out of that 20 as its members.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
In the First Indian War of Independence, what was the main reason the British were able to defeat the Indians?
natka813 [3]

There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

<span><span>Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.</span><span>Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.</span><span>Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.</span><span>Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:<span>The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}</span>The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.</span></span>

At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.

6 0
2 years ago
1. Compare the systems of government in Great Britain and the United States.
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Great Britain has a Prime Minister and Parliament.

The Untied States has a President and Congress.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
1. (02.01 LC) What does "separation of powers" mean? (3 points)​
Umnica [9.8K]
Separation of powers refers to our checks and balances system which ensures each body of government cannot over power the others.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Rockslides, in real life, are terrifying events. in the proposed commercial, the teens caught in the rockslide are happy because
    10·1 answer
  • Why are there so few pure traditional economies today?
    5·1 answer
  • Which ics functional area tracks resources, collects and analyzes information, and maintains documentation?]?
    12·2 answers
  • You may cross over either a single solid yellow line or double solid yellow lines to make a left turn at an intersection, to ent
    6·1 answer
  • In some societies, closely related members of the ruling class and the upper class marry to preserve their power and wealth with
    9·1 answer
  • Who did the congress of vietnam want to restore power to
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Do you think Jackson was a defender of the nation and its interests or a bully that ignored the constitution? Explain.
    11·1 answer
  • When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice?
    5·1 answer
  • THIS IS ACTUALLY SCIENCE BUT PLS HELP I NEED THIS BY MIDNIGHT PLS HELP
    11·2 answers
  • 6. What did the Israelites do after they reached Canaan?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!