A) The answer is 11.53 m/s
The final kinetic energy (KEf) is the sum of initial kinetic energy (KEi) and initial potential energy (PEi).
KEf = KEi + PEi
Kinetic energy depends on mass (m) and velocity (v)
KEf = 1/2 m * vf²
KEi = 1/2 m * vi²
Potential energy depends on mass (m), acceleration (a), and height (h):
PEi = m * a * h
So:
KEf = KEi + <span>PEi
</span>1/2 m * vf² = 1/2 m * vi² + m * a * h
..
Divide all sides by m:
1/2 vf² = 1/2 vi² + a * h
We know:
vi = 9.87 m/s
a = 9.8 m/s²
h = 1.81 m
1/2 vf² = 1/2 * 9.87² + 9.8 * 1.81
1/2 vf² = 48.71 + 17.74
1/2 vf² = 66.45
vf² = 66.45 * 2
vf² = 132.9
vf = √132.9
vf = 11.53 m/s
b) The answer is 6.78 m
The kinetic energy at the bottom (KE) is equal to the potential energy at the highest point (PE)
KE = PE
Kinetic energy depends on mass (m) and velocity (v)
KE = 1/2 m * v²
Potential energy depends on mass (m), acceleration (a), and height (h):
PE = m * a * h
KE = PE
1/2 m * v² = m * a * h
Divide both sides by m:
1/2 * v² = a * h
v = 11.53 m/s
a = 9.8 m/s²
h = ?
1/2 * 11.53² = 9.8 * h
1/2 * 132.94 = 9.8 * h
66.47 = 9.8 * h
h = 66.47 / 9.8
h = 6.78 m
The answer is no moons<span> at all. That's right, </span>Venus<span> (and the planet Mercury) are the only two planets that don't </span>have<span>a single natural </span>moon<span> orbiting them. Figuring out why is one question keeping astronomers busy as they study the Solar System.</span>
No, because he was a philosopher
Answer:
They diverge on refraction
Explanation:
When parallel light rays strike a concave lens, they will diverge that is they spread out .
Concave lens is also known as diverging lens, which means that when parallel rays of light strike on it, the lens spreads out the light rays ( that is it diverges the rays of light) that are refracted through it.
At the middle of concave lens is thinner.
When light is passes through the lens they diverge it or spread out.
The concave lens causes light rays to bend away or diverge from its axis since the concave lens is a diverging lens.